<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: THE NEW GREEN IS BROWN?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:00:12 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-3857</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:09:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/#comment-3857</guid> <description>Matt hit it exactly....I was  concerned when seeing the post&#039;s title that it may have been misinterpreted.  It was rather  a throwaway comment when discussing all the new alliances forming within the  environmental field (exactly as Matt put it), and I think I said something to the effect of &quot;So maybe the new green is actually turquoise, or mix in some other colors--republican red, libertarian yellow, etc--and  maybe the new green is actually brown. Although that&#039;s probably not quite as marketable a color!&quot; You see--it was really just a throwaway comment.Although I&#039;m also very comfortable in the assertion that &quot;green&quot; is no longer only elite white.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt hit it exactly&#8230;.I was  concerned when seeing the post&#8217;s title that it may have been misinterpreted.  It was rather  a throwaway comment when discussing all the new alliances forming within the  environmental field (exactly as Matt put it), and I think I said something to the effect of &#8220;So maybe the new green is actually turquoise, or mix in some other colors&#8211;republican red, libertarian yellow, etc&#8211;and  maybe the new green is actually brown. Although that&#8217;s probably not quite as marketable a color!&#8221; You see&#8211;it was really just a throwaway comment.</p><p>Although I&#8217;m also very comfortable in the assertion that &#8220;green&#8221; is no longer only elite white.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-3354</link> <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:49:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/#comment-3354</guid> <description>The brown in the title refers to the comment that the Ben Jervy made about atypical alliances, namely green environmentalists, blue labor leaders, red state capitalists, etc. in addition to the civil rights/health concerns of people of color. Mixing all of these &quot;colors&quot; together creates brown.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The brown in the title refers to the comment that the Ben Jervy made about atypical alliances, namely green environmentalists, blue labor leaders, red state capitalists, etc. in addition to the civil rights/health concerns of people of color. Mixing all of these &#8220;colors&#8221; together creates brown.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Octavio</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-3353</link> <dc:creator>Octavio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:45:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/#comment-3353</guid> <description>I think &quot;BROWN&quot; refers to Brown folk.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;BROWN&#8221; refers to Brown folk.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Johnson</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-3342</link> <dc:creator>Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:43:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/#comment-3342</guid> <description>What does the title mean?  What is the &quot;BROWN&#039; being referred to in the title?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the title mean?  What is the &#8220;BROWN&#8217; being referred to in the title?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Micky</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-3341</link> <dc:creator>Micky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:42:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/#comment-3341</guid> <description>The notion that banning cars in Central Park will create traffic congestion in Harlem is not only a valid claim, but an issue to be address.  If a major through fare is cut off there will be spill over onto the streets.  Anyone  uptown trying to get to points east and west will not acess to the major road arteries and as a result this traffic will have to spill over onto the streets.  With higher than average air pollution problems, Harlem cannot afford or support an influx in cars in the community.  The more cars that are redirected trying to find an east west connect will have to traverse the streets of Harlem until they get to 116th or 125th Streets.  One of the few streets with river to river access not impeded by a park, a building, a campus or a hospital.So the notion that there will be traffic congestion, is a fair statement and one that should be look at when talking about closing Central Parks to cars.  The idea to close Central Park to cars is a good one, but when advocating for this it is also to advocate that people get out of their cars and rely on mass transportation, especially during rush hour when the park will be closes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion that banning cars in Central Park will create traffic congestion in Harlem is not only a valid claim, but an issue to be address.  If a major through fare is cut off there will be spill over onto the streets.  Anyone  uptown trying to get to points east and west will not acess to the major road arteries and as a result this traffic will have to spill over onto the streets.  With higher than average air pollution problems, Harlem cannot afford or support an influx in cars in the community.  The more cars that are redirected trying to find an east west connect will have to traverse the streets of Harlem until they get to 116th or 125th Streets.  One of the few streets with river to river access not impeded by a park, a building, a campus or a hospital.</p><p>So the notion that there will be traffic congestion, is a fair statement and one that should be look at when talking about closing Central Parks to cars.  The idea to close Central Park to cars is a good one, but when advocating for this it is also to advocate that people get out of their cars and rely on mass transportation, especially during rush hour when the park will be closes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: m</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-3299</link> <dc:creator>m</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:51:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/07/20/the-new-green-is-brown/#comment-3299</guid> <description>The notion that banning cars in Central Park will cause traffic jams in Harlem is based cn completely false premises.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion that banning cars in Central Park will cause traffic jams in Harlem is based cn completely false premises.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 20/33 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-21 13:35:29 -->