<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: THE PERFECT $100,000 HOUSE</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:00:12 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/comment-page-1/#comment-47098</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:45:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/#comment-47098</guid> <description>Hi, Cool idea.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Cool idea.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Frank</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/comment-page-1/#comment-10038</link> <dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/#comment-10038</guid> <description>Hi,Great idea! But sadly a 1000sq foot home is just NOT what most customers are looking for. I believe average home sizes keep creeping upward. Probably over 2300 sq ft, which even at $100 a sq foot is $230,000 and not really affordable for many families.I agree we need to become more attuned to minimizing square footage without necessarily sacrificing life style, healthy home, sustainable, green concepts.Also much of the design seems to focus on INDIVIDUAL homes, I&#039;d love to see more efforts on housing for small developments of 50-100 units that are holistically planned. Look forward to your comments.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>Great idea! But sadly a 1000sq foot home is just NOT what most customers are looking for. I believe average home sizes keep creeping upward. Probably over 2300 sq ft, which even at $100 a sq foot is $230,000 and not really affordable for many families.</p><p>I agree we need to become more attuned to minimizing square footage without necessarily sacrificing life style, healthy home, sustainable, green concepts.</p><p>Also much of the design seems to focus on INDIVIDUAL homes, I&#8217;d love to see more efforts on housing for small developments of 50-100 units that are holistically planned. Look forward to your comments.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: frances</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/comment-page-1/#comment-10010</link> <dc:creator>frances</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:58:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/#comment-10010</guid> <description>If nothing else, if the book helps get people thinking smaller in this country of living big (houses, cars, weight, sprawl, etc.), then it&#039;s worth the trees it&#039;s printed on.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If nothing else, if the book helps get people thinking smaller in this country of living big (houses, cars, weight, sprawl, etc.), then it&#8217;s worth the trees it&#8217;s printed on.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/comment-page-1/#comment-10005</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:42:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/#comment-10005</guid> <description>Hey, I&#039;m in Troy, NY right now! And a perfect $100,000 home I see not. The parts of town where I can imagine a $100k home existing are not the parts of town you want to live in. Maybe I have to read the book to end my puzzlement.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m in Troy, NY right now! And a perfect $100,000 home I see not. The parts of town where I can imagine a $100k home existing are not the parts of town you want to live in. Maybe I have to read the book to end my puzzlement.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: eric</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/comment-page-1/#comment-9917</link> <dc:creator>eric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:19:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/#comment-9917</guid> <description>Hate to be pedantic, but &quot;perspective home buyers&quot; should be &quot;prospective home buyers&quot;.Also, is there any discussion in this book about having an inexpensive (or perhaps reasonably priced) house cost more in the long-run, due to the standard lack of attention given to environmentally- and wallet-friendly measures that can be taken to (pre-)fabricate a house?  For example, just because a house is $100 per square foot, if that cost doesn&#039;t include proper insulation and good orientation with respect to its surroundings, the price point becomes far less meaningful.  Maybe that&#039;s not the point of the book.  But discussing the purchase and selection of one&#039;s home without talking about the energy it will use is, in the 21st century, antiquatedly ignorant of the 800-pound gorilla in the room.  Especially if the author claims &quot;perfection&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to be pedantic, but &#8220;perspective home buyers&#8221; should be &#8220;prospective home buyers&#8221;.</p><p>Also, is there any discussion in this book about having an inexpensive (or perhaps reasonably priced) house cost more in the long-run, due to the standard lack of attention given to environmentally- and wallet-friendly measures that can be taken to (pre-)fabricate a house?  For example, just because a house is $100 per square foot, if that cost doesn&#8217;t include proper insulation and good orientation with respect to its surroundings, the price point becomes far less meaningful.  Maybe that&#8217;s not the point of the book.  But discussing the purchase and selection of one&#8217;s home without talking about the energy it will use is, in the 21st century, antiquatedly ignorant of the 800-pound gorilla in the room.  Especially if the author claims &#8220;perfection&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Orrin</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/comment-page-1/#comment-9886</link> <dc:creator>Orrin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:17:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inhabitat.com/blog/2006/10/15/the-perfect-100000-house/#comment-9886</guid> <description>First sentence: a 14,000 what?  $14,000?  14,000 mile?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First sentence: a 14,000 what?  $14,000?  14,000 mile?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 22/34 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-22 01:03:59 -->