Inhabitat











March 7, 2007

BEIJING’S OLYMPIC STADIUM by Herzog and DeMeuron

by Emily Pilloton

Beijing Olympic Stadium, Beijing Olympics 2008, Birds Nest building, Herzog DeMeuron, Green stadium building,

After featuring the stunning “bubble building” being built for the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, we felt it necessary to mention an equally-awesome structure under construction just across the way. Herzog and DeMeuron’s Olympic Stadium, fondly referred to by some as the “Bird’s Nest,” is a feat of engineering, an aesthetic marvel, and an uber-green machine to boot. What we love most about the stadium’s design is its integration of a myriad complex systems all rolled into such an aesthetically and conceptually simple and stunning object. The Swiss architects describe it best, saying, “The spatial effect of the stadium is novel and radical and yet simple and of an almost archaic immediacy. Its appearance is pure structure. Facade and structure are identical.”

Beijing Olympic Stadium, Beijing Olympics 2008, Birds Nest building, Herzog DeMeuron, Green stadium building,

The structure itself is composed of a grid-like formation that serves as both structure and facade, integrating the stairs, walls, and roof into one cohesive system. Instead of form being dictated by function, Herzog and DeMeuron’s design effectively removes the distinction, making function and form one in the same.

Such a large-scale and highly-trafficked building raises questions of waste, efficiency, and cost, but the “Bird’s Nest” seems to pose innovative, green solutions to a variety of potential building issues. Its green features include a rainwater collection system, a translucent roof that provides essential sunlight for the grass below, and a natural, passive ventilation system.

Perhaps the most unique feature of the structure is its “cushion” system which strategically fills the spaces within the building’s facade to regulate wind, weather, and sunlight. On the rooftop, the inflatable cushions fill gaps to weather- and waterproof the stadium. “Just as birds stuff the spaces between the woven twigs of their nests with a soft filler, the spaces in the structure of the stadium will be filled with inflated cushions.” Coincidentally, the cushions will be made from ETFE, the same material used to create the translucency of the “bubble building” across the Olympic park.

Sculptural rather than an architectural sensory overload like many a contemporary stadium, “it meets all the functional and technical requirements of an Olympic National Stadium, but without communicating the insistent sameness of technocratic architecture dominated by large spans and digital screens.”

Beijing Olympic Stadium, Beijing Olympics 2008, Birds Nest building, Herzog DeMeuron, 2008 Olympics Site

Beijing Olympic Stadium, Beijing Olympics 2008, Birds Nest building, Herzog DeMeuron, Herzog De Meuron, Beijing Herzog DeMeuron

Beijing Olympic Stadium, Beijing Olympics 2008, Birds Nest building, Herzog DeMeuron, Olympic Stadium Interior

Beijing Olympic Stadium, Beijing Olympics 2008, Birds Nest building, Herzog DeMeuron, 2008 Olympics Site, Olympic Stadium Interior, herzog demeuron interior

Beijing Olympic Stadium, Beijing Olympics 2008, Birds Nest building, Herzog DeMeuron, Olympic Stadium Interior, herzog demeuron interior

Beijing Olympic Stadium, Beijing Olympics 2008, Birds Nest building, Herzog DeMeuron, Herzog De Meuron

Beijing Olympic Stadium, Beijing Olympics 2008, Birds Nest building, Herzog DeMeuron

54 Responses to “BEIJING’S OLYMPIC STADIUM by Herzog and DeMeuron”

User Gravatar
Zeek Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Looks like a prison complex from a futuristic Sylvester Stallone movie. Seriously- It feels like a place to lock people away, not a community gather place. Very intimidating. To me this proposed museum in Abu Dhabi accomplishes somthing similar, but in a much more open way.
http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2007/03/07/arts/07louv_CA0.ready.html

User Gravatar
Angelo Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Beautiful. Absolutely stunning!

User Gravatar
jon burrage Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Zeek I have to disagree, I think its stunning. Totally different and inventive. In areas of the world such as china and the UAE where development and money are abundant (when they need to be) why stick to normality, push the boundaries and play with forms. Its stunning, zaha hadid’s design is amazing also…i love this exciting, new, crazy development.

User Gravatar
Richie Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Yeah… it does look GREAT… much like Zaha Hadid’s ‘Performing Arts centre in Dubai’ … BUT… AGAIN… how are the transluscent pillow like sections, or it’s glazing, going the be cleaned. As China develops, it has some of the worst air pollution on the planet. So this design will be covered with sooty grime before long if there are no realistic provisions for cleaning its exterior and interior surfaces. But then again, in a totalitarian country like China, they could create ’suicide cleaning squads’ to get up on the roof of this stadium and clean ! If they fell off… well, that would just be an example of them sacrificing trhemselves for the greater glory of the peoples revolution, right ?

User Gravatar
Dave C Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

“An uber-green machine?’ I think not. We shouldn’t confuse natural aesthetics, marketing, and a bit of innovation with what is really a massive waste of money, and resources. For a different take on the Bird’s Nest stadium, check out this interview with Chinese landscape architect Kongjian Yu from the American Society of Landscape Architects:
http://www.asla.org/land/2006/1017/yu.html

He notes that the Bird’s Nest stadium uses twice as much steel as typical stadium construction and will have no real use for the Chinese once the Olympics are over. Smarter Olympic stadium plans are taking hold in London, and in Olympic proposals in Chicago and Los Angeles where “Olympic Stadiums” are being designed to be scalable so that when the Olympic events end the stadium can be scaled down for regular use by the cities.

Finally, shouldn’t we be thinking about this from a wider perspective? Why does every Olympics require the construction of permanent infrastructure that will go largely unused by the host city once the events are over? Aren’t there enough cities in the world with massive stadiums and existing infrastructure to host these events?

User Gravatar
Simon Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Hi, does anyone know where I can get hold of the original hi-res images of the stadium?

User Gravatar
Duncan Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Seriously though… China appears to be the future for this kind of thing. Give it a couple of years and most design will be coming out of China.

User Gravatar
Nobody present Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Looks like large yarn doughnut.

User Gravatar
kamy Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

OMG… That looks stunning. Don’t you have more hi-res pictures?

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Looks like a wad of yarn. They better get started quick if they expect to get this god aweful thing up in time for 08. And wtf is up withy the ‘bubble building’??? Looks kind of square.

User Gravatar
Peter K Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

The Olympic Stadium in Sydney had a capacity of 110,000 (the largest in Olympic History). After the games the north and south “wings” were removed an the capacity reduced to 85,000. The athletics track was removed and the seating around the arena moved forward on hydraulic powered rails to move spectators closer to the action on the football field. It can be moved back again if required to allow for the re-installation of an athletics track if needed.

The stadium now hosts, Australian Rules Football, Rugby League, Rugby Union (it hosted the 2003 Rugby World Cup), Football, Cricket, even concerts if needed. Sydney’s games infrastructure is in regular use by local and national sporting organisations and events. Every two years the Australian Youth Olympic festival attracts young olympic hopefuls from around the world to these venues in a week long competition in their respective sports. The legacy of Sydney games infrastructure lives on to this day through these events.

User Gravatar
Tyzemail Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

that does look pretty amazing, will london 2012 be able to match it?

User Gravatar
Foretell Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Looks like a prison. China will destroy America within 20 years.

User Gravatar
Rory B Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I think that anyone who thinks that this stadium will go ‘largely unused’ after the olympics is forgetting how many billion people china has, I am sure they will find a use for it….

In terms of the environmental impact of the building, I think it would be wiser look at the overall enviromental impact of the actual event of the olympics as a whole. Imagine the combined impact of not only the construction, planning, raw materials, processing and transport, but also the transportation and resources to support the millions of athletes and spectators from around the world, all so we can watch someone run around a track faster than another person?

so if they’re going to screw it up for the rest of us they may as well build a permanent monument to remember it. well done. i love it.

User Gravatar
Scott Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

It’s is an absolutely amazing piece of design, and I can hardly believe that people could think that it will be left to rot after the Olympics. As an ex-Sydneysider, the Olympics infrastructure is in regular use for sporting and non-sporting events. Further, the Olympics spurred urban regeneration in a part of Sydney that was a disaster area.

Dave C, you state
“Finally, shouldn’t we be thinking about this from a wider perspective? Why does every Olympics require the construction of permanent infrastructure that will go largely unused by the host city once the events are over? Aren’t there enough cities in the world with massive stadiums and existing infrastructure to host these events?”

Yes, there are, but given that these stadia are primarily located in first world countries, why should developing nations have the opportunity to host the Olympics if they so wish? I personally think there are better things for governments to spend their money on (the UK government would arguably be better served pouring the £12billion in the Cross Rail, for example) but it is a little elitist to suggest that only countries with the infrastructure should be the only ones able to hold such events.

User Gravatar
Karen Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

We just returned from China (Beijing) after a week November 2006. If this indeed is what’s being built, it sounds nice. But, from the construction we saw, and there was lots of it, they are pretty much wiping out most of what made Beijing unique from the west. There is a big push there to make everything “modern”, but they are interpreting from suburbia: the boring track malls, the cookie-cutter town homes. Even the Forbidden City was getting refurbed. And for this arena to have transparent walls and roof seems absurd, we were in the city for four days before we were aware that there were mountains in the distance, the polution from coal and car exhaust was breath prohibitive.

User Gravatar
YASMIN la todopoderosa Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

la verdad no entendí nada porque nose hablar, ni leer bien ingles, pero me pareció un estadio formidable, vivo en chile y con suerte hay uno así en nuetros sueños, es lindo, pero me gustaría que hubiera tenido una forma mas original, y con más luces como el alians arena, pero igual está bien
Chau besitos

User Gravatar
guillermo Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

uh loko re grosso el estadio me gustaria ir apara alla cuando argentina gane la medalla de oro en futbol y basquet.. loko re buena onda ustedes…. sigan asi me voy a fumar un faso ahora se vemo man…

User Gravatar
frs Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

asi va a quedar el estadio de vargas manga de chino gay … la rioja tiene mas tecnologia que esa cagada

User Gravatar
JRD Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

The amount emboided energy of the steel used to create the birds nest aesthetic so much larger than any other stadium that the energy payback for the ‘ecological’ features are about 130 years! This building while impressive aesthetically (I love the form and more generally the reintroduction of texture into the work) it should not be considered ecologially responsible. I recall being in Beijing during the 50th anniversary celebration of the communist party, yes they can use stadiurms for other uses, then they used them as detention centers for people deemed to have illegally migrated to the city.

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

the irregular steel skin to form the birds’ nest is not for structural perposes,
it not only wastes millions money but also looks very crumsy.
to build such stupid skin is absolutely foolish.
when I looked at the construction of this skin—welding, casting
with huge steel sections- the work is so hard –I am very sorry for that
furthermoore, just as someone is thinking about the future maintenance,
how to clean up the irregular huge concret members of his skin?
everyone knows about the environment of beijing!.

User Gravatar
Per Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Its a great renewal of Beijng, and will remain as a classic famous attraction for when China joined the world!

User Gravatar
God Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

It looks like some kid with dementia started playing around on MS Paint. Ignoring the stupid waste, expense, negative environmental impact, and amount of time required to build this, it just looks stupid. It’s a bunch of squiggly lines that someone wants to recreate in concrete - why? There’s nothing wrong with architectural innovation and design, but this is just pointless.

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

its the old time practice, when we would like to keep the design in good proportion,
we are not satisfy in the small scale (1/100) elevation, we usually put some portiont in enlarged
scale, say 1/50 or 1/25 even in full size details.
If we do it somewhat like that, then, the huge steel concrete members of the skin would show up,
you would think it over over again for the future rreal effect.and difficulty of work.
But I am sorry the contemporary practice just based on the small scale of computer design.
so it is hard to visualize the actual effect .

User Gravatar
Paul Higgins Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Cannot wait to be there and sample it in real life a lifetimes ambition for me and my daughter!!!!

User Gravatar
DB Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

there is blood all over it.. subsidized by the human organ market. the judicial system is corrupt. human rights violations too numerous to count.

people starve, breathe polluted air and bathe in contaminated water - but let’s paint grass green and build a stadium/futuristic prison complex so the world can see how great china is! :-/

User Gravatar
yosma Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

its amazing construccion!
woa…
dont have more words!!!
hehe
congratulations!!!

User Gravatar
jon b Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

DB writes “there is blood all over it.. subsidized by the human organ market. the judicial system is corrupt. human rights violations too numerous to count”

There are answers to the above. Where there is a buyer, there is a sellers. There are plenty of companies in US as well as UK and others buying and selliing organs to hospitals. DB has clearly picked and chose china as the target and attacked indiscriminately. Second, to say the entire Olympic compound is built on organ money is childish and absurd. Third, all judicial systems are corrpted one way or the other. China is corrupted but china has no monopoly on corruptions. Speaking of human rights viiolations, lets not forget the outright exterminations of “american indians” and native hawaiians. One might argue these people are still here. The fact is that these livings aren’t looked the same as their ancestors 200 years ago. The pure blooded natives are all dead. If you insists, UK’s colonial past tells a lot of atrocities, brutalities and was the only state sponsored opium trafficker in the history of mankind. This was how acquired its wealth with which the empire was built.

User Gravatar
Jay Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

The building looks loke a good place for giant birds and UFO’s to land

User Gravatar
Madison Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

it looks great, but im gonna have to agree w/ jon b.

User Gravatar
Natasha Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

wow, i think it’s absolutley amazing… it’s different compared to all the other designs of stadiums i’ve seen. this might sound sad, but i can sit there looking at it all day! have you seen londons’ one? i live 5 minutes away from it and now i’m ashamed for living so close to it! it has no… passion to it! it looks like it was made in a hurry… very saddening indeed…

User Gravatar
chris Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I think it’s a great undertaking for the chinese in the 2008 olympics. Truly it is a start for safer environmentally friendly buildings and architectural ideas …so they say. They might as well use their billions of dollars they have to build something cool.

User Gravatar
Alix Speed Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

u mit see me in it

User Gravatar
ser Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Rory B
“I think that anyone who thinks that this stadium will go ‘largely unused’ after the olympics is forgetting how many billion people china has, I am sure they will find a use for it….”

a prison for falun gong grannies?

User Gravatar
jake Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

wooooww wat a great design…….meaning asian nation conquer the world’s hmmm left american design nothing…….more asian nation make diferent futuristic design not only like tallest towers like in Malaysia in Taipei in dubai and rest of asia…China’s olympic stadium is a stunning one of all the olympic stadium in the world just like in Qatar….nice and beautiful one…..its a futuristic design i

User Gravatar
dominic Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

It’s indeed stunning.. I had the chance to have a good enough looking company to not only get in, but even on the roof of the stadium (July 2007). If you fancy having a look at the stadium as it currently looks like then you can turn to http://dondomingo.nomadlife.org/2007/07/discovering-beijings-olympic-stadium.aspx or http://www.flickr.com/photos/dondomingo.
HdM continue being an inspiration!

User Gravatar
Evan Jones Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

A lot of the negative responses are due to the fact that we in the UK are never going to compete with what they are achieving in Beijing!

I mean, they are ahead of schedule! The IOC have actually suggested they slow down the construction for fear of completing the buildings early, hence losing revenue as the buildings will be empty!

What do we have in the UK? Tonnes and tonnes of ‘red tape’, disagreements all the way and no public support whatsoever! Our olympic stadium is decidedly lacklustre, it certainly isn’t as iconic nor memorable as the ‘birdsnest’ and the adjacent ‘watercube’.

No doubt everything will be delayed or totally redesigned due to lack of funding and/or overspending. What is it with this country, we are a developed country, but we sure aren’t as efficient nor concientious as the Chinese. They work hard, we don’t…

User Gravatar
Wendy Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

———
Dave C Says:

March 8th, 2007 at 10:08 am
“An uber-green machine?’ I think not. We shouldn’t confuse natural aesthetics, marketing, and a bit of innovation with what is really a massive waste of money, and resources. For a different take on the Bird’s Nest stadium, check out this interview with Chinese landscape architect Kongjian Yu from the American Society of Landscape Architects:
http://www.asla.org/land/2006/1017/yu.html
He notes that the Bird’s Nest stadium uses twice as much steel as typical stadium construction and will have no real use for the Chinese once the Olympics are over.
———-

A landscape architect? I think he is out of his depth when it comes to architecture - what he says is rather glib. American Society of Landscape Architects?? That says it all. Americans will do anything to slight or hinder the Chinese. It’s due to the growing realisation that they will no longer be ‘Number One’ anymore.

———-
“Smarter Olympic stadium plans are taking hold in London, …“Olympic Stadiums” are being designed to be scalable so that when the Olympic events end the stadium can be scaled down for regular use by the cities.”
———-

REALLY? So constructing a semi-permanent Olympic Stadium from scratch, whilst there is already a newly completed one in the shape of Wembley! is that SMART?

Beijing doesn’t currently have an up-to-date Olympic sized stadium for their (larger) population. London does!

———-
“Finally, shouldn’t we be thinking about this from a wider perspective? Why does every Olympics require the construction of permanent infrastructure that will go largely unused by the host city once the events are over? Aren’t there enough cities in the world with massive stadiums and existing infrastructure to host these events?”
———

Is this a proposal for the continued dominance of the West in all apsects of global life?!
lol…

———-
Evan Jones Says:

July 26th, 2007 at 5:24 pm
A lot of the negative responses are due to the fact that we in the UK are never going to compete with what they are achieving in Beijing!
———

Totally agree. I think we are already embroiled in planning controversy already!!!

User Gravatar
shabazz Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

this is splendid, and a masterpiece of Architecture.i think it is wort taking a second look every now and then.

User Gravatar
passerby Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

lol. beautiful and controversial at the same time. splendid!

User Gravatar
David Foster Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Saw it the other week during visit to China. Amazing building

User Gravatar
kartik Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

ULTIMATE BUILDING OF MODERN ERA
SIMPLY MAGISTIC

User Gravatar
Oliver Null Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

The strength of this work is that it can extract many positive and negative critiques. It is engaging and solicits many interpretations,all of which are valid. Can it be viewed both as a nest or a cage?..yes……….this is a strength….it’s design is a beautiful contradiction, that belies explanation.

User Gravatar
cowit Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

esta es una obra de arte m da mucho gusto saber que las olimpiadas se realizaran es china

User Gravatar
vadz Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

very impressive and beautiful design.

User Gravatar
Guy Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

The Beijing Olympic buildings are something all of humanity should take pride in. For just a fraction of what the US is spending on a war on the people of Iraq, the Chinese are showing the whole world how money can be used to create fantastic, long living archetectural works of arts instead of the terrorism of war.

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

buruk! babi

User Gravatar
Handsome boy Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

How many seats are there in different stadiums?

User Gravatar
Gary Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I don’t know anything about architecture but given the quality of the merchandise they’re sending over here for our consumption I would not feel safe in the shadow of that building. Good luck to all who dare step inside it.

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

‘Bird’s Nest’ becomes a scenic spot
More information at
http://www.beijingbirdnest.com

User Gravatar
Daniel Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

What companies did the construction of the of stadium?

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

A superb architectural landmark befitting the world’s oldest extant civilasation and culturally rich peaceful nation.

User Gravatar
cutie Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Thankyou for your article

User Gravatar
didi Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

the building itself seems to have defied the idea of ‘form follows function’…it certainly is transparent, true to its essence..uniting engineering and architecture without one being dominant.

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.

SIGN UP NOW

CURRENT USERS LOGIN

Lost your password?

Add your comments