<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: WHICH TECH BRAND IS THE GREENEST? Greenpeace Reports</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/09/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/09/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:06:21 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Daniel</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/09/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-43343</link> <dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:14:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/09/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/#comment-43343</guid> <description>&quot;Meanwhile, Apple is singled out for not responding to Greenpeace’s demands, ranking last on the list.&quot;So this isn&#039;t objective, it&#039;s basically Greenpeace attempting to blackmailing Apple, despite the fact that it has been shown time and time again that last years hit piece was highly flawed and ignored a huge number of industry firsts Apple had taken (such as setting up a recycling program for old Macs?)  Greenpeace is really damaging their credibility on this issue.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Meanwhile, Apple is singled out for not responding to Greenpeace’s demands, ranking last on the list.&#8221;</p><p>So this isn&#8217;t objective, it&#8217;s basically Greenpeace attempting to blackmailing Apple, despite the fact that it has been shown time and time again that last years hit piece was highly flawed and ignored a huge number of industry firsts Apple had taken (such as setting up a recycling program for old Macs?)  Greenpeace is really damaging their credibility on this issue.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gilbert</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/09/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-43321</link> <dc:creator>Gilbert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:25:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/04/09/which-tech-brand-is-the-greenest-greenpeace-reports/#comment-43321</guid> <description>Hmmmmm.... It is not so surprising that Al &quot;The Hypocrite&quot; Gore is on the board of directors at Apple Inc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmm&#8230;. It is not so surprising that Al &#8220;The Hypocrite&#8221; Gore is on the board of directors at Apple Inc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 24/30 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-23 11:17:04 -->