<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: TiANJIN&#8217;S &#8216;PILE OF BOXES&#8217;</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:16:52 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: skywingz</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-195505</link> <dc:creator>skywingz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:19:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/#comment-195505</guid> <description>Don&#039;t really like it. Again, it&#039;s subjective.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t really like it. Again, it&#8217;s subjective.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: xilangan</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-74665</link> <dc:creator>xilangan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:24:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/#comment-74665</guid> <description>THIS IS ARCHITECTURE!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS IS ARCHITECTURE!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Will</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-48062</link> <dc:creator>Will</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 04:50:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/#comment-48062</guid> <description>I can&#039;t say I believe with the aesthetics...but then again not everyone agrees with the aesthetics of a Frank Gehry building.However the attempt for a sustainable building by Atkins Design and the developer is admirable. It makes a positive statement which will create positive dialogue and discussions for residences and visitors alike.We need to encourage and challenge more architects and developers to create more projects like this....btw, Michael V..and your statements about citizens being removed without compensation is 100% wrong. So get your facts right before you post your political BS.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say I believe with the aesthetics&#8230;but then again not everyone agrees with the aesthetics of a Frank Gehry building.</p><p>However the attempt for a sustainable building by Atkins Design and the developer is admirable. It makes a positive statement which will create positive dialogue and discussions for residences and visitors alike.</p><p>We need to encourage and challenge more architects and developers to create more projects like this&#8230;.</p><p>btw, Michael V..and your statements about citizens being removed without compensation is 100% wrong. So get your facts right before you post your political BS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mac</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-46029</link> <dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 10:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/#comment-46029</guid> <description>The debate as to whether something is green enough or not is kind of irrelevant at the moment. I think the fact that China is making a conscious effort to even build these things is a good thing. You may argue that it&#039;s all just an image thing, trying to make themselves look better to the outside world, but I say whats wrong with that, at least they are doing something right?China has a real opportunity to lead the way on the green front. I hope for out sake they kick start the western worlds efforts. If this construction can sustain itself and look as nice as it does then I say build more!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate as to whether something is green enough or not is kind of irrelevant at the moment. I think the fact that China is making a conscious effort to even build these things is a good thing. You may argue that it&#8217;s all just an image thing, trying to make themselves look better to the outside world, but I say whats wrong with that, at least they are doing something right?</p><p>China has a real opportunity to lead the way on the green front. I hope for out sake they kick start the western worlds efforts. If this construction can sustain itself and look as nice as it does then I say build more!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jill</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-45918</link> <dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 23:27:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/#comment-45918</guid> <description>Hi Sam-I think you are wrong in your assessment of this as &quot;greenwashing&quot;.  We report on designs we think are noteworthy, and we think this is noteworthy for development in China.  The building uses a geothermal heat pump, is full or gardens, uses wind energy and - FINALLY - is extremely dense, which is very efficient in terms of resources and energy useage.If you look in the post you will see we point out the geothermal heating/cooling, the wind turbines and the gardens - we never claimed this was green simply because it gets a lot of light.Finally - our posts on Inhabitat are not endorsements - they are simply posts.  We write about stuff that is newsworthy and noteworthy,  We think this is a noteworthy building in Tianjin.  Because we write about something doesn&#039;t necessarily mean its the greenest thing ever, and it doesn&#039;t mean we support it (unless we write &quot;we love it&quot; &quot;we support it&quot;).Please bear this in mind, and read more carefully before making comments like this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sam-</p><p>I think you are wrong in your assessment of this as &#8220;greenwashing&#8221;.  We report on designs we think are noteworthy, and we think this is noteworthy for development in China.  The building uses a geothermal heat pump, is full or gardens, uses wind energy and &#8211; FINALLY &#8211; is extremely dense, which is very efficient in terms of resources and energy useage.</p><p>If you look in the post you will see we point out the geothermal heating/cooling, the wind turbines and the gardens &#8211; we never claimed this was green simply because it gets a lot of light.</p><p>Finally &#8211; our posts on Inhabitat are not endorsements &#8211; they are simply posts.  We write about stuff that is newsworthy and noteworthy,  We think this is a noteworthy building in Tianjin.  Because we write about something doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean its the greenest thing ever, and it doesn&#8217;t mean we support it (unless we write &#8220;we love it&#8221; &#8220;we support it&#8221;).</p><p>Please bear this in mind, and read more carefully before making comments like this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sam</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-45913</link> <dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 20:37:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/#comment-45913</guid> <description>Wait, are we saying that all a designer has to do now is make a spot to put wind turbines and they&#039;ve accomplished some sort of innovative green design? I mean, it looks like there&#039;s lots of natural light and maybe there is more to it, but neither their website nor this post points out any compelling &quot;green&quot; features.If anything, shining high-powered lights on the rooftops is going to be an incredible energy-waster.Argh. Another case of something that looks cool and claims to be &quot;green&quot;, but doesn&#039;t seem to have anything to back it up. This blog is posting more and more of this stuff. Green design should be about encouraging people to use resources more conservatively. That&#039;s far more important than how neat things look!Taken from the Inhabitat&#039;s Mission Statement: &quot;Good design is not about color, style or trends - but instead about thoughtfully considering the user, the experience, the social context and the impact of an object on the surrounding environment. No design can be considered good design unless it at least attempts to address some of these concerns.&quot; Come on guys, let&#039;s see this philosophy come out in what you post!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, are we saying that all a designer has to do now is make a spot to put wind turbines and they&#8217;ve accomplished some sort of innovative green design? I mean, it looks like there&#8217;s lots of natural light and maybe there is more to it, but neither their website nor this post points out any compelling &#8220;green&#8221; features.</p><p>If anything, shining high-powered lights on the rooftops is going to be an incredible energy-waster.</p><p>Argh. Another case of something that looks cool and claims to be &#8220;green&#8221;, but doesn&#8217;t seem to have anything to back it up. This blog is posting more and more of this stuff. Green design should be about encouraging people to use resources more conservatively. That&#8217;s far more important than how neat things look!</p><p>Taken from the Inhabitat&#8217;s Mission Statement: &#8220;Good design is not about color, style or trends &#8211; but instead about thoughtfully considering the user, the experience, the social context and the impact of an object on the surrounding environment. No design can be considered good design unless it at least attempts to address some of these concerns.&#8221; Come on guys, let&#8217;s see this philosophy come out in what you post!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Osi Okonkwo</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-45904</link> <dc:creator>Osi Okonkwo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 17:51:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/#comment-45904</guid> <description>To Architecture Fan: I would not say that China is leaving the US in the dust although this is a very unique design. It is intriguing to say the least.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Architecture Fan: I would not say that China is leaving the US in the dust although this is a very unique design. It is intriguing to say the least.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael V.</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-45896</link> <dc:creator>Michael V.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:54:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/#comment-45896</guid> <description>PILE OF THRASHPoor design aesthetics!How is China leaving the US in the dust? They steal, borrow and takes all the world&#039;s ideas without
paying any compensation for copyright or intellectual property! BYW - Shanghai not only kicks out and
removes it&#039;s citizens for development, but pays them ZERO dollars for their property or land, &quot;that is true
Chinese innovation!&quot; And no that do not have 1/4 of the world&#039;s constructions cranes, get your facts right before you post BS&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PILE OF THRASH</p><p>Poor design aesthetics!</p><p>How is China leaving the US in the dust? They steal, borrow and takes all the world&#8217;s ideas without<br
/> paying any compensation for copyright or intellectual property! BYW &#8211; Shanghai not only kicks out and<br
/> removes it&#8217;s citizens for development, but pays them ZERO dollars for their property or land, &#8220;that is true<br
/> Chinese innovation!&#8221; And no that do not have 1/4 of the world&#8217;s constructions cranes, get your facts right before you post BS&gt;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Architecture Fan</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-45886</link> <dc:creator>Architecture Fan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 13:46:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/#comment-45886</guid> <description>I think this design is GREAT! I see China leaving the U.S. in the dust in terms of green development in the next 25 years. 1/4 of the world&#039;s cranes are in Shanghai alone, constructing often vulgar but very interesting new buildings.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this design is GREAT! I see China leaving the U.S. in the dust in terms of green development in the next 25 years. 1/4 of the world&#8217;s cranes are in Shanghai alone, constructing often vulgar but very interesting new buildings.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lackar</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-45882</link> <dc:creator>lackar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 13:00:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/#comment-45882</guid> <description>Nice building！</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice building！</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hun Boon</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-45881</link> <dc:creator>Hun Boon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 13:00:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/05/17/tianjins-pile-of-boxes/#comment-45881</guid> <description>Shanghai and Beijing have some of the world&#039;s most adventurous architecture, and I&#039;m glad to see that other major cities in China are following their fine example. This will certainly be a sight to behold when it&#039;s completed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shanghai and Beijing have some of the world&#8217;s most adventurous architecture, and I&#8217;m glad to see that other major cities in China are following their fine example. This will certainly be a sight to behold when it&#8217;s completed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 24/39 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-27 14:33:23 -->