<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: LIFECYCLE BUILDING CHALLENGE: Pavilion in the Park</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/10/15/lifecycle-building-challenge-pavilion-in-the-park/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/10/15/lifecycle-building-challenge-pavilion-in-the-park/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:48:56 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/10/15/lifecycle-building-challenge-pavilion-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-56476</link> <dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:26:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/10/15/lifecycle-building-challenge-pavilion-in-the-park/#comment-56476</guid> <description>Mikeee... you&#039;re right, that&#039;s why all those LEED buildings have little tiny windows. (/snark)I don&#039;t know what will become of the building. After three or more high-rise housing starts, it has to be moved to build on that property, but there&#039;s not really a good place to put it. A definitive answer could be had from the gurus at SkyscraperCity, though - their Seattle forum has piles of urban planning and real estate people. I could also ask a friend of mine (I&#039;m in Seattle).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikeee&#8230; you&#8217;re right, that&#8217;s why all those LEED buildings have little tiny windows. (/snark)</p><p>I don&#8217;t know what will become of the building. After three or more high-rise housing starts, it has to be moved to build on that property, but there&#8217;s not really a good place to put it. A definitive answer could be had from the gurus at SkyscraperCity, though &#8211; their Seattle forum has piles of urban planning and real estate people. I could also ask a friend of mine (I&#8217;m in Seattle).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mikeee</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/10/15/lifecycle-building-challenge-pavilion-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-56389</link> <dc:creator>Mikeee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:35:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/10/15/lifecycle-building-challenge-pavilion-in-the-park/#comment-56389</guid> <description>There&#039;s so much glass and metal that I wonder how efficient this will isolate warmth inside in the cold months. Doesn&#039;t seem very good at all to me.
Looks very sexy though. Good thing for a warmer climate maybe.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s so much glass and metal that I wonder how efficient this will isolate warmth inside in the cold months. Doesn&#8217;t seem very good at all to me.<br
/> Looks very sexy though. Good thing for a warmer climate maybe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glowing Lotus</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/10/15/lifecycle-building-challenge-pavilion-in-the-park/comment-page-1/#comment-56301</link> <dc:creator>Glowing Lotus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:11:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/10/15/lifecycle-building-challenge-pavilion-in-the-park/#comment-56301</guid> <description>I work for a modular company, and it looks like these potential &quot;modules&quot; are wayyyy too wide for transport, especially for downtown Seattle. I&#039;ve seen this building in person and am curious if it was delivered as modules, or built entirely on-site. If the scale is at all correct on the Miller Hull site, these appear to be three or four times wider than a truck. I can tell you that 16&#039; is optimal and 20&#039; would be pushing it. Does anyone know the detail on this structure? I wonder if they really did their research on the module part, or if it is truly more theoretical in nature. Next time I&#039;m down there, I&#039;m bringing my tape measure...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for a modular company, and it looks like these potential &#8220;modules&#8221; are wayyyy too wide for transport, especially for downtown Seattle. I&#8217;ve seen this building in person and am curious if it was delivered as modules, or built entirely on-site. If the scale is at all correct on the Miller Hull site, these appear to be three or four times wider than a truck. I can tell you that 16&#8242; is optimal and 20&#8242; would be pushing it. Does anyone know the detail on this structure? I wonder if they really did their research on the module part, or if it is truly more theoretical in nature. Next time I&#8217;m down there, I&#8217;m bringing my tape measure&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 24/31 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-26 09:48:07 -->