Inhabitat











November 26, 2007

THE MAGLEV: The Super-powered Magnetic Wind Turbine

by Mahesh Basantani

Maglev, wind turbine, chinese wind power, wind power, wind turbine china, big wind turbine, magnetic levitation wind turbine, magnetic wind power, levitation wind power

Renewable energy produced from the wind has garnered much attention and support in recent years but is often criticized for its low output and lack of reliability. But now a super power wind turbine has come along that may be just what the renewable energy industry needs. The MagLev wind turbine, which was first unveiled at the Wind Power Asia exhibition in Beijing, is expected take wind power technology to the next level with magnetic levitation.


Maglev, wind turbine, chinese wind power, wind power, wind turbine china, big wind turbine, magnetic levitation wind turbine, magnetic wind power, levitation wind power

Magnetic levitation is an extremely efficient system for wind energy. Here’s how it works: the vertically oriented blades of the wind turbine are suspended in the air above the base of the machine, replacing the need for ball bearings. The turbine uses “full-permanent” magnets, not electromagnets — therefore, it does not require electricty to run. The full-permanent magnet system employs neodymium (”rare earth”) magnets and there is no energy loss through friction. This also helps reduce maintenance costs and increases the lifespan of the generator.

Maglev wind turbines have several advantages over conventional wind turbines. For instance, they’re able to use winds with starting speeds as low as 1.5 meters per second (m/s). Also, they could operate in winds exceeding 40 m/s. Currently, the largest conventional wind turbines in the world produce only five megawatts of power. However, one large maglev wind turbine could generate one gigawatt of clean power, enough to supply energy to 750,000 homes. It would also increase generation capacity by 20% over conventional wind turbines and decrease operational costs by 50%. If that isn’t enough, the maglev wind turbines will be operational for about 500 years!

Construction began on the world’s largest production site for maglev wind turbines in central China on November 5, 2007. Zhongke Hengyuan Energy Technology has invested 400 million yuan in building this facility, which will produce maglev wind turbines with capacities ranging from 400 to 5,000 Watts. In the US, Arizona-based MagLev Wind Turbine Technologies will be manufacturing these turbines. Headed by long-time renewable energy researcher Ed Mazur, the company claims that it will be able to deliver clean power for less than one cent per kilowatt hour with this new technology. It also points out that building a single giant maglev wind turbine would reduce construction and maintenance costs and require much less land than hundreds of conventional turbines. The estimated cost of building this colossal structure is $53 million.

+ Maglev Wind Turbine

Treehugger MagLev WindTurbine Image

118 Responses to “THE MAGLEV: The Super-powered Magnetic Wind Turbine”

User Gravatar
Andrew M Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

This is a great post. I love reading about technologies that we actually have, rather than things some company plans to invent some day. $53 million seams a little low however… oh well. Its a steal at quadrupole the price!

User Gravatar
Jason Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I love the information being shared on your web site. Please continue to inform the world about new energy.

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] is expected take wind power technology to the next level with magnetic levitation." More: Inhabitat THE MAGLEV: The Super-powered Magnetic Wind Turbine _________ Go slow, let it grow. Promote! Create reef videos and add them to 3reef! Join the […]

User Gravatar
Vandelay Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Really blends into that landscape nicely ; )

User Gravatar
Nick Simpson Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I’m really no expert, but this looks pretty deliverable (well it must be if they’re about to build one!)… If all goes well with the first one there’ll hopefully be a few of these built, not least here in the UK - we’ve got the majority of Europe’s potential for wind generation so this could be a real possibility. Great to see!

User Gravatar
holdfast Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I am a huge envirotech-skeptic, and frankly have been pretty dismissive of current-gen wind turbines - they are loud, bird-pureeing eyesores - and worst of all, they are uneconomic. All that said, if this article is only 20% correct, then this is a huge advance. Good to see that China and the US are getting in on the ground floor. Both countries really need the clean energy. Frankly US and China are the most important energy consumers - both use a hell of a lot of coal (’cause they have it and it is cheap - unfortuntely is is dirty, especially in China), both import a lot of oil, and these imports increase every year, both have dynamic growing economies (China a lot more so, but they have a lot further to go), and, perhaps uniquely in the world today, both have the means AND the will to fight for energy sources, if necessary. The last is perhaps the key point - and it is entirely rational - but much better that they don’t have to.

User Gravatar
Kevin Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Oh great, so now we’re going to get our cheap energy from China, too. Hello, why doesn’t the US just spent a measly $1B for like 20 of these??

User Gravatar
Jan Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Sounds great. What are the disadvantages and how will the NIMBYs attack it?

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] 26th, 2007 Misschien best nog even wachten vooraleer je een windmolentje of 10 in je tuin zet. De Maglev-turbine kan volgens de ontwerpers aanzienlijk meer energie opwekken. Zowel China als de VS werken in […]

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments […]

User Gravatar
Jacob Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Interesting product, but you should probably fix the typo stating the turbine currently in development in China will product “400 to 5,000 watts”, think you mean MW.

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments […]

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] Mais informações em: inhabitat […]

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] Forrás: inhabitat - THE MAGLEV: The Super-powered Magnetic Wind Turbine […]

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] you see in the distance is a mockup of the Maglev Wind Turbine that is reportedly 1000x more efficient than a standard […]

User Gravatar
Dave Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

This design doesn’t look very efficient, as only half the blades will be driven at any given time.

User Gravatar
Hyponx Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

The idea behind efficiency on a wind turbine is based largely on surface area.

this design allows the system to employ large amounts of surface area from several massive fins simultaneously while conserving a lot of space since the system is circular. the above comment isnt exactly true because the traditional vertical turbine causes friction on the actual mounting when its weight is increased limiting its maximum size while this system must be horizontal (inherently for the magnetic system to be effective) but can be scaled very easily to increased sizes (virtually limitless)

User Gravatar
Hyponx Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

It could also perhaps be noted that even if only half of the blades are driven at time the combined surface area of half of these blades is still much greater then the surface area of all of the fins on a traditional turbine occupying the same amount of space

User Gravatar
what if Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

What if the blades were then covered with solar panels

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] to massive sizes, and the ability to generate power with winds as slow as three miles per hour.read more | digg […]

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] The folks at inhabitat.com get excited about almost anything that is Green Tech and this is no different. They have an article on a wind turbine that uses rare earth magnets instead of electromagnets to float a large upright turbine in the air. The claims are breathtaking. Check it out. […]

User Gravatar
David Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

This concept is nothing new and has been hashed and rehashed numerous times. They are more appropriately called vertical axis wind turbine or (VAWT). Almost all have failed because the amount of energy from the wind at ground level is almost negligible! Why do you think they have 200ft+ towers for the “regular” wind turbines? Furthermore I highly doubt they are able to overcome the forces that will be at play by using magnets to keep the blade mounting system from touching the base. How will it be able to apply the proper force to keep it “level” when the wind blows 30mph from the east so it will want to tilt to the west then all of a sudden stops? It will require a pretty complicated system to combat that along with an awful lot of electricity to counter-act those forces. Until you can actually purchase one this is still a “vaporware” product.. The RE field is full of pre-announced products that never make it to the end-consumer.

User Gravatar
Norton Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

….”tis an ill wind that blows no mind”

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] The MagLev Wind Turbine relies on magnets to suspend the turbine reducing friction.  Its design and technology allow the wind turbine to produce more power and take up less space.  Estimated cost for the strucure is $53 Million. […]

User Gravatar
amanda Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

wow!!! i have been kicking this idea around forever… well, actually two different ideas, magnetic driven engines, and wind sources. think about making this thing on a smaller scale and putting it somewhere that has lots of constant winds, like perhaps a highway

User Gravatar
amanda Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

or perhaps an airport

User Gravatar
russ Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

It does look like a bit of a blot on the landscape but if it’s as cheap as it says then tit could be just what we need.

I wonder how noisy it would be.

User Gravatar
TimTemple Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Neodymium magnets are a natural resource. They are most commonly found in China but is far from an inexhaustible source. That is why this design of windmill is most likely to be built in China and not the USA, not forgetting the Bush administration of course…

While mentioning USA and China as high energy users don’t forget far and away the second highest populated nation India that is also big on manufacture dwarfing the USA.

User Gravatar
BENJAMIN Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

When will you geniuses that repeat the tired mantra of ‘loud, bird-killing’ turbines just go see for yourselves that you have NO idea what you’re talking about? Why don’t you form your own legitimate opinion rather than be spoon-fed tired vomit from others? Do you have the capacity to think for yourself at all?

Have you ever stood underneath a turbine? NO…b/c they are quieter than the wind it takes to power them….
How many dead birds have you actually seen? I’ve been in wind for 3+ years and have seen ZERO dead birds…

GET A LIFE

User Gravatar
Jan Pushooka Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Why not make them smaller and lie them on their sides in tunnels (Like the London Underground) Plenty of wind down there! Maybe it could make enough power to run the whole Underground system? Just a thought!

User Gravatar
Anonymous Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

“400 to 5,000 watts”
that’s rather low… :)

User Gravatar
Peter Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

There is a problem for this concept

If you would single rotor blades from the bottem to the top then the windspeeds are not the same at the bottom and at the top. For a windmill it wouldn’t be a problem their rotor is only a few metres.
But if you have rotors higher then a mountain. One should realy investigate different rotors

Or perhaps multiple rotors at diferent altitudes

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] one of these long-lasting giants can power 750,000 homes!  Check out Inhabitat for the full story here. Digg this article    Post to reddit    Hugg this article Add to […]

User Gravatar
Vinay Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

A very good concept at construction Stages.

User Gravatar
Reid Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Um, how well does it deal with snow and ice?

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] to massive sizes, and the ability to generate power with winds as slow as three miles per hour.read more | digg […]

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] at Inhabitat has put together a very interesting article on a Gigawatt Magnetic Levitation Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (try saying that five times fast). Renewable energy produced from the wind has garnered much […]

User Gravatar
Stuart Gathman Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Deployment will be difficult. Proposed sites must ensure that the turbine does not spoil the view from the mansion of any prominent environmentalist.

User Gravatar
Jose Garcia Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

If there is no speed differential of the wind from one side of the turbine to the other, this huge monster won’t rotate a bit. It will just oscillate. Is that how it generates energy? Regular wind turbines seem to have a more efficient shape…

User Gravatar
chas Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I have used a good many wind turbines and they ARE very noisy.

The article mentions generators up to 5000 watts. You have to believe them. They have a small model that can only do a minor amount of power.

They are doing this pie in the sky scale-up the technology hype.

Anybody that says any technology will still be operational in 500 years is just about to put their hand in your pocket. Surprised they are not coupling this with come kind of over unity hydrogen via water scam too.

User Gravatar
monkey Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Vertical turbines are not effective. You have to consider the gradient of energy density as a funciton of altitude. This is someone trying to attract investors.

User Gravatar
Angus Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Sorry but this sort of thing just makes me laugh. Where should I start…
Normal wind turbines are 20-40% efficient in normal use, a so much more efficient wind generator would be pretty much impossible. Note they say that the max they will actually be building is 5kw … now where is that mile wide gigawatt generator they talk about? :)
To be honest bearing losses are generally negligible in wind turbines, they only take up a very small fraction of power, while adding a small amount of efficiency ‘maglev’ bearings will not be worth the effort.
It’s a VAWT. They are inherently unstable going through torque pulsations on every cycle of it, they are really only to be seen as experimental. And look at the bloody airfoils on that and think how much power they’re gonna lose…!
So, until I see any hint of anything real, a glint of glass in a haystack of BS - I will cry out loud
VAPOURWARE

User Gravatar
ryan Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I made a vawt similar to this for testing purposes (minus the levitation, much smaller and lacking the inner cylinder). A regular cylinder shape worked much better than the conical version.

“It’s a VAWT. They are inherently unstable going through torque pulsations on every cycle of it, they are really only to be seen as experimental. And look at the bloody airfoils on that and think how much power they’re gonna lose…!” - Angus

This style vawt doesn’t suffer as much from torque pulses. The higher blade count gives you more, smaller, pulses. The blades are not airfoils like you’re used to thinking of them. This is not a lift machine - at least not as depicted - it works similar to a Savonius, not like a Darrieus.

The claims are pretty out there though, I’ll give you that. That said, if they achieve 1/10th of the claim, this could replace 100 conventional turbines. The last time I checked prices on the big commercial turbines they cost $1.2-2m installed. That would make this design (if they stay on-budget) twice as efficient where it really counts…dollars spent for watts produced.

User Gravatar
Angus Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

‘This style vawt doesn’t suffer as much from torque pulses. The higher blade count gives you more, smaller, pulses.’
Yes but the large number of blades also creates a lot of drag-non-efficient. What really gets me is the claim of a 1GW turbine - even a 2000ft wide generator would ‘only’ make 68 MW …
Just another ‘investor scheme’ throwing out buzz-words…
JMHO - YMMV

User Gravatar
shaun Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

sounds too good to be true. you all must know what they say about things that sound too good to be true.

the reason that all commercially successful wind turbines to date look basically the same is because this is the most efficient design. you can only slow the wind down so much for optimal extraction of energy. if you take out too much energy, the wind becomes too slow and prevents other wind from reaching your turbine at full speed.

so, the question becomes “what device can take the right amount of energy out of the most wind for the least cost”

which becomes “what device can intercept the most wind for the least cost”

and, in 1975, an international conference found that the type of turbine in use today is the best answer:

http://www.ifb.uni-stuttgart.de/~doerner/HAWT-VAWT.html

there may be niche markets for other designs, but this design appears to be a hoax, magnetic bearings and all.

User Gravatar
Benjamin Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

BENJAMIN,

Thank God for your common sense. It’s difficult to read the looters with the “can’t do” attitudes droning on and on.

-Benjamin

User Gravatar
Pieter Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I a agree with Ryan that the picture suggests that the turbine seems to be a very large Darrieus design. This design works on the drag principal and will have at most half of the aero dynamical efficiency of a conventional wind turbine which works on the lift principle. Using maglev technology reduces the energy loss due to friction of the axis. However, this is a relatively insignificant loss. I am surprised that no experts are consulted before publishing such extreme claims by unknown companies.

User Gravatar
Wont Work Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Incredibly stupid idea. 100 acres ???? for one turbine???

What happens when it needs maintenance? Just tell everyone to turn off their lights?

User Gravatar
mel Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

the should pictures on the blades, so that it looks like there is always a drive in movie playing.

I am going to try to make a small one for my land, been wanting to build a wind powered
generator.

User Gravatar
tony Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Ryan is missing some points. The conical shape is required because of the great height. The wind speed averages higher near the top than the bottom - ever gone up to the top of a skyscraper? Torque pulses smooth out as the mass of the rotor increases - the flywheel effect - as long as you can avoid resonent frequencies at the wind speeds it will encounter.

User Gravatar
Nikita Kondraskov Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Nice article.
I find it rather difficult to beleave that this maglev turbine is posssible, before I see some real working concepts.

User Gravatar
DanB Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

To the people who’ve replied (some of them)…
wind turbines are pretty quiet.
Place properly they don’t kill birds. (all tall man made things - towers - buildings - ect) kill a few…
Cats kill gobs of birds.
This is a pipe dream/scam - an inefficient design and all the mag lev stuff is designed to get people who don’t know much better excited. It’s all about marketing a product that will neither work very well - or likely even exist.

We need renewable energy - lets educate ourselves and spend our resources on stuff that works. I think these people are con artists.

User Gravatar
Rhys Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Now how to store the energy for later? The first thing I thought when I looked at this was oh, what a great place to put a water tower. You could have a large water tower beside it or above it and pump water up during low demand and us hydro power during low demand.

User Gravatar
Crafty Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

These figures look impressive. But what we need to look at is reserve energy. a reserve needs to be in place. it’s easy to claim 750 thousand homes, What if the wind is not active for 4 or 5 hours? You need to use less than what it can generate in order to build up a reserve of energy.

User Gravatar
Kelly Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

BENJAMIN seems very angry with comments reflecting concern with bird kills generated by wind farms, asserting that his personal experience of 3+ years with wind farms establishes that there are no bird kills at wind farms. He shouts that people who believe to the contrary are dupes, repeating falsehoods promulgated by unnamed ‘others’ and that, incongruously, these dupes should “get a life”. ???

Benjamin, with his “3+ years experience” with wind farms, is right that the problem can be exaggerated but he is quite wrong in asserting that wind turbine bird kills is zero.

According to the California Energy Commission, the Altamont Pass wind farm w/5,000 turbines (providing clean electrical power to 1,200 homes) kills approximately 1,700-4,700 birds annually, including ~880 to 1,300 Federally protected raptors each year, among them: burrowing owls, red-tailed hawks, falcons, and golden eagles. That birds collide with invisible turbine blades spinning 200′ in the air, should surprise no one. Current annual estimates for turbine related bird kills in the US are in the range of 30,000-60,000, this with wind power accounting for less than 1% of US energy needs. Bird kill numbers can be expected to accelerate rapidly as wind farm deployment dramatically increases over the next 20 years.

Advocates of wind energy and the wind energy industry itself acknowledge the problem and have put forward various plans to mitigate bird deaths, including idling turbines during the winter months; relocating or dismantling the turbines responsible for the greatest number of kills; and greatly reducing the number of turbines, while maintaining capacity, with the introduction of new, high-efficiency units, a process known as “repowering”. In the specific case of Altamont Pass where cattle roam freely among many of the the towers, cow turds at the base of the towers attract critters that in turn attract raptors which in turn fly into the turbine blades. Part of the solution is to keep cattle well away from the base of the towers so that this “attractive nuisance” critter population attracts the raptors far from the towers.

I have worked with utility companies constructing wind farms and I’m an advocate of wind power as part of the mix of newer, cleaner, sustainable energy sources. I am also an advocate of finding solutions to the shortcomings of these energy sources and that includes taking aggressive action to mitigate the unnecessary deaths of these birds. We cannot eliminate all bird kills by wind turbines but cooperative engagement with aviary experts, US Fish and Game, environmental groups, and careful planning can reduce the needless killing of birds by over 50% and that is well worth doing.

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

WOW - That’s all I can say. It looks like something out of a sci-fi movie, but 100 Acres vs 64,000, surely, that’s a no brainer then? Clean renewable energy, good output, the right price and we’d only need to stick a couple hundred of these up to power the entire UK!!

User Gravatar
Jan Pushooka Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Sorry DanB but Maglev does work!! You say “lets educate ourselves and spend our resources on stuff that works”
Well if everyone thought like that, our motorways would be full of people pushing wheelbarrows! They worked!

User Gravatar
Jim M Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

One thing this article dose not mention is the fact that conventional power plants have multiple turbines with out put of around 500 MEGA watts. Each having a generator attached to the Turbine (driver). Also these units are scheduled for shut down about once a year for maintenance; some one posed the question of what happens when this one needs maintenance? Well I guess your 75,000 homes go black, or you rely on the grid system that is being supplied by other conventional plants. The only use that this type of generation is good for is what is called a “peaker” to use in tandem with power plants for times where energy demand is excessive. Mag lev wind generation could only be used to curb use of conventional methods. Not replace them. Instead of dreams of massive inefficient eye sores. Spend the money to improve or build atomic plants, they are much safer, cleaner and cheaper than the public thinks.

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] Here is what appears to be a very promising variant in efforts to harness the wind for electricity. […]

User Gravatar
wallace Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

A point that everyone misses is that, unlike conventional power systems, these giants need to be necessarily exposed to the open air. Anyone who has had to clean house can imagine the quantities of muck that will be picked up in a normal working day at a wind farm. The self-cleaning / self-healing technology is not yet economic enough to make the maintenance costs manageable.

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] than participate in its governance.Futuristic green technology that will save us all of the day: A maglev turbine - The answer to my first objection: “The turbine uses ‘full-permanent’ magnets, not electromagnets […]

User Gravatar
James Hawk III Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Uh, pardon me for asking what will appear to be a stupid question, but…if the entire rotor is maglevitated…how does it transfer motion to the generator shaft? If I’m reading this correctly, not only do the magnets have to support the entire rotor structure, they also have to support the generator shaft, and on top of that, there has to be some sort of mechanism for ensuring that the brushes on the shaft stay in pretty much the right location relative to the magnets in the generator housing itself.

Or are they drawing power off of the levitation magnets themselve by making the turbine the brushes? Or something else that I haven’t thought of?

User Gravatar
James Hawk III Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Actually, I have other questions. Even if we imagine some kind of fantastical mechanical linkage for the generator shaft, has anyone sat down to determine exactly what kind of magnetic field it takes to levitate what is obviously a multi-megaton structure? What kind of engineering will it take to make a permanent magnet set at that scale, and how will you keep them from sticking together during construction? Will they have to be delivered on ceramic trucks? Can human beings even survive exposure to magnetic fields that powerful?

I’m with Angus. There are serious questions that aren’t being answered by the glossy brochures and glib PR-speak that goes with this.

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

This sounds way too good. If this is true, then we can take emissions to 0 by 2015 globally. However, I too am a bit curious. Do they have a website with details? What company is doing this? When we get bett