Inhabitat











March 26, 2008

Daekwon Park’s Superstructure for Sustainable Skyscrapers

by Mike Chino

eVolo Architecture, Daekwon Park, Symbiotic Interlock, skyscraper competition, new design, architecture, sustainable design, eVolo, prefabricated housing, wind power, future architecture, Sustainable Building, daekwonpark1.jpg

Now in its fourth year running, the eVolo Skyscraper Competition takes future-forward architecture to its breaking point, unveiling a stunning array of new structural concepts by architects, engineers, and designers. The latest crop of entries is up, and Daekwon Park’s Symbiotic Interlock goes far beyond the standard skyscraper to envision a total renovation of inner-city infrastructure. The pitch: it’s modular, prefabricated, and completely symbiotic on the existing vertical infrastructure of the city.

eVolo Architecture, Daekwon Park, Symbiotic Interlock, skyscraper competition, new design, architecture, sustainable design, eVolo, prefabricated housing, wind power, future architecture, Sustainable Building, daekwonpark2.jpg

Skyscrapers are one of the modern city’s most ideologically charged structures. Dominating the skyline, they captivate and articulate a wealth of ideals while anchoring a city’s social fabric. As the world’s population increases and cities stretch to accommodate it, these structures will become increasingly important in sustaining this massive influx. Out of necessity, they will have to evolve. eVolo Architecture was founded in 2003 by a group of international architects in NYC and hosts a yearly contest dedicated to rethinking the skyscraper in radical new ways. The only requirement: “Designs must be technologically feasible and environmentally responsible.”

Daekwon Park created Symbiotic Interlock “to reunite the isolated city blocks and insert a multi-layer network of public space, green space and nodes for the city”. It comprises a system of stackable modules that are designed to add an extra layer of infrastructure to existing buildings via sky docks and bridges, vertical gardens, cultural spaces, and energy producing wind turbines. It addresses some of the shortcomings of green roofs by internalizing green environments within its biomorphic structure while contributing functionality, energy, and food. It may not have beaten the competition, but its symbiotic integration with existing buildings struck us as a brilliant brand of future-forward thinking within the present era.

+ evolo-arch.com

Via treehugger.com via Pruned

eVolo Architecture, Daekwon Park, Symbiotic Interlock, skyscraper competition, new design, architecture, sustainable design, eVolo, prefabricated housing, wind power, future architecture, Sustainable Building, Evol - Park3

eVolo Architecture, Daekwon Park, Symbiotic Interlock, skyscraper competition, new design, architecture, sustainable design, eVolo, prefabricated housing, wind power, future architecture, Sustainable Building, Evol - Park2

12 Responses to “Daekwon Park’s Superstructure for Sustainable Skyscrapers”

hugo
hugo Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

This realy looks great and is a great source of inspiration for me. As a parasite it uses some essentials from the excisting structures. Though the design is not my taste, the idea is great; creating sub-communities in large scale communities. Actually downscaling the city…

LivingSpaceBuilders.com
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

But hugo, as you see from the photos only beautiful people can live inside of these structures :)

User Gravatar
PL Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I think this would be a disaster for our cities - both visually and socially. Hugo is right. They are parasitic and they look the part. I can’t imagine the crime that would occur on those sky bridges. And I just don’t think these are green at all. I know there are wind turbines here and there and some sky gardens but that’s doesn’t nearly come close to off-setting the resources needed to make these and the extra energy they are drawing from their hosts. And all that structure for hardly any programmable space - who would pay for that? Anyway, let’s get past the cool imagery and criticize it for what it is.

organicgrid
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

By far, one of the ugliest Sustainable Skyscrapers I have ever seen. Looks like a beehive for humans.

Scott
Scott Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

How do I enter into the competition? Exciting stuff!

User Gravatar
bpg131313 Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

While I\’m not sold on the vertical structures themselves, I do like the idea of sky bridges. The idea that one can get to a building a few blocks away simply by going through the bridges means a lot of time saved by not getting on an elevator, going down, walking on the sidewalks and having to stop for traffic at each intersection, and then getting on an elevator to get to the floor you needed to be on in the building. Sky bridges are a great idea and I think they deserve further study in their wider adoption throughout a city structure.

Mike Chino
Mike Chino Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Hi Scott,
Archicool has a post outlining what the submission process was like for the 2008 contest. Since it’s a yearly competition, I’d imagine the next contest will fall along a similar timeline (October - March). We’ll be sure to post updates as the year progresses. Best of luck!

http://www.archicool.com/cgi-bin/presse/pg-newspro.cgi?id_news=3466

Kate Andrews
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Mike - Thanks for posting this competition, it’s made happy [and inspired] reading this evening. K.

shroomie77
shroomie77 Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

PL- what kinds of crimes do you speak of?

And what would make you say they’re not green?

…I would pay for that.

User Gravatar
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

[…] the spirit of Daekwon Parks’ Symbiotic Superstructure, we’re continuing coverage of the eVolo Competition with another incredible entry. This […]

doug l
doug l Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I think I prefer these fantastic structures to the skyscrapers they are attempting to connect. Perhaps they could grow organically and evolve into elevated nests where the villages similar to the arboreal societies of our past could flourish, up above the floor of the (concrete) jungle.

User Gravatar
supersoyboy Says:
 Add karma Subtract karma  +0

I think its trying to make more of a statement than be practical so in that sense it would be more sustainable to not even have them around!

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.

SIGN UP NOW

CURRENT USERS LOGIN

Lost your password?

Add your comments


Bad Behavior has blocked 27400 access attempts in the last 7 days.