<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: BLOBWALL: Modern Modular Building System</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:48:56 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: treythefarmer</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/comment-page-1/#comment-114373</link> <dc:creator>treythefarmer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:15:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/#comment-114373</guid> <description>Wow.  I like it.  The design is playful and fun.  In the current atmosphere of urgency, peril and doom, from all sides of the spectrum, it is refreshing to see something so playful as this.  Maybe the merits of it as a serious form of architecture are questionable but inspiration has intangible benefits that lead far into the future.  Lighten up a bit my friends, enjoy the short time we have here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I like it.  The design is playful and fun.  In the current atmosphere of urgency, peril and doom, from all sides of the spectrum, it is refreshing to see something so playful as this.  Maybe the merits of it as a serious form of architecture are questionable but inspiration has intangible benefits that lead far into the future.  Lighten up a bit my friends, enjoy the short time we have here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dogsix.com</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/comment-page-1/#comment-88361</link> <dc:creator>dogsix.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:33:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/#comment-88361</guid> <description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with the previous posts.  While I too was once drawn to the allure of &#039;Blobitecture&#039;, once I saw Greg Lynn speak, I lost all respect for the &#039;happy accident&#039; that this thoughtless, unrealistic, un-important slice of architectural history if offering us.  A previous Inhabitat article said it better than I could.  here&#039;s an excerpt from the full article here: http://inhabitat.com/2006/12/29/greening-the-ivory-tower&quot;Green Architecture vs. Blobitecture&quot;Green architecture is thoughtful architecture, and thoughtfulness is crucial to good architecture. Good architecture is born out of vision, passion and social conscience. It is not about producing fancy algorithms or random blobby shapes in Maya. Blobitecture is all surface and no substance, and architecture is ultimately not about surface; it’s about the experience and impact of three-dimensional space. If one’s work deals primarily in surface, aesthetics and symbolism, then one is an artist instead of an architect. Sustainable design – at its best – comes from thinking deeply and rigorously about how humans use, occupy and function in a space over time, and in turn how spaces impact urban fabric, society and culture. To approach architecture in a more superficial way is lazy and shortsighted.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with the previous posts.  While I too was once drawn to the allure of &#8216;Blobitecture&#8217;, once I saw Greg Lynn speak, I lost all respect for the &#8216;happy accident&#8217; that this thoughtless, unrealistic, un-important slice of architectural history if offering us.  A previous Inhabitat article said it better than I could.  here&#8217;s an excerpt from the full article here: <a
href="http://inhabitat.com/2006/12/29/greening-the-ivory-tower" rel="nofollow">http://inhabitat.com/2006/12/29/greening-the-ivory-tower</a></p><p>&#8220;Green Architecture vs. Blobitecture&#8221;</p><p>Green architecture is thoughtful architecture, and thoughtfulness is crucial to good architecture. Good architecture is born out of vision, passion and social conscience. It is not about producing fancy algorithms or random blobby shapes in Maya. Blobitecture is all surface and no substance, and architecture is ultimately not about surface; it’s about the experience and impact of three-dimensional space. If one’s work deals primarily in surface, aesthetics and symbolism, then one is an artist instead of an architect. Sustainable design – at its best – comes from thinking deeply and rigorously about how humans use, occupy and function in a space over time, and in turn how spaces impact urban fabric, society and culture. To approach architecture in a more superficial way is lazy and shortsighted.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jdiewald</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/comment-page-1/#comment-87907</link> <dc:creator>jdiewald</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:37:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/#comment-87907</guid> <description>The problem with this project is that it ignores the fundamental merits - even the point - of &#039;modular&#039; construction.  If you read into the process of how the wall was created in the blog, you will find that EVERY ONE of those &#039;modules&#039; is a unique shape, tediously custom cut to create the form of the wall in the exhibition.  The project is by no means modular and certianly not sustainable.  Is is an interesting exercise in how to produce the most labor intensive type of &#039;modular construction&#039; known to man and a sophomoric attempt at novelty.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with this project is that it ignores the fundamental merits &#8211; even the point &#8211; of &#8216;modular&#8217; construction.  If you read into the process of how the wall was created in the blog, you will find that EVERY ONE of those &#8216;modules&#8217; is a unique shape, tediously custom cut to create the form of the wall in the exhibition.  The project is by no means modular and certianly not sustainable.  Is is an interesting exercise in how to produce the most labor intensive type of &#8216;modular construction&#8217; known to man and a sophomoric attempt at novelty.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: manifold</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/comment-page-1/#comment-87860</link> <dc:creator>manifold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:02:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/#comment-87860</guid> <description>a little kooky but creative.  just because it is not easy to &#039;immediately apprehend&#039;  does not mean that it is without merit.  it&#039;s necessary to push the boundaries in order to move forward.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a little kooky but creative.  just because it is not easy to &#8216;immediately apprehend&#8217;  does not mean that it is without merit.  it&#8217;s necessary to push the boundaries in order to move forward.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: eriknbrooklyn</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/comment-page-1/#comment-87849</link> <dc:creator>eriknbrooklyn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:37:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/#comment-87849</guid> <description>Oh christ. Not again. Seriously, human beings think in terms of Cartesian coordination (rectangles and prisms). Whats the point of your &quot;module&quot; requires abstraction to understand? My mind should be able to immediately apprehend its orientation and location in a mass plane or line. This is a kitschy masturbation of bored minds. While I can never condemn trying something new, I can condemn parading it about as something it&#039;s not. Keep it in the children&#039;s museum where it belongs or try to actually use it for its &quot;intended purpose&quot; (as a unit of construction). Build a place for DWELLING and you might have something...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh christ. Not again. Seriously, human beings think in terms of Cartesian coordination (rectangles and prisms). Whats the point of your &#8220;module&#8221; requires abstraction to understand? My mind should be able to immediately apprehend its orientation and location in a mass plane or line. This is a kitschy masturbation of bored minds. While I can never condemn trying something new, I can condemn parading it about as something it&#8217;s not. Keep it in the children&#8217;s museum where it belongs or try to actually use it for its &#8220;intended purpose&#8221; (as a unit of construction). Build a place for DWELLING and you might have something&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: earthsmile</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/comment-page-1/#comment-87804</link> <dc:creator>earthsmile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:38:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/07/blobwall-the-brick-reinterpreted/#comment-87804</guid> <description>As an &#039;Art&#039; project.. fine. Nice work. As a practical building material... this is a joke. Quite frankly, outside the realm of &#039;Art&#039;, this is a totally ridiculous product... and really beneath the standards of inhabitat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an &#8216;Art&#8217; project.. fine. Nice work. As a practical building material&#8230; this is a joke. Quite frankly, outside the realm of &#8216;Art&#8217;, this is a totally ridiculous product&#8230; and really beneath the standards of inhabitat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 24/34 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-26 08:58:58 -->