Whatcotts Yard ‘In-between’ terrace houses

Raw and exposed with a distinct rural Romanticism, UllmayerSylvester Architects’ updated version of the terrace house, called the Whatcotts Yard or ‘In-between‘ project, is best known as an independent award-winning collaboration with Annalie Riches and Barti Garibaldo. The project, located in Whatcotts Yard, Stoke Newington won several awards in 2004 for its unique and direct approach to building sustainable homes. Since then, Silvia Ullmayer and Allan Sylvester opened their practice and have since gone on to work on innovative projects such as The New Summerhouse and Minihome Nursery, both in Hackney, London.

whatcotts yard, in between homes, terrace homes, terraced houses, ullmayer sylvester architects, london homes, sustainable homes, sustainable design, annalie riches, barti garibaldo

The Whatcotts Yard project was undertaken between 2001 – 2004 when the group met at what is now the London Metropolitan University. After deciding to build themselves a home, it took them another year to find a suitable site, and then two more years to get planning permission, design and then fully complete the build.

Choosing sustainable materials, the homes were constructed from Parallam laminated timber posts and beams. The homes also include used sheep wool and recycled newspaper for insulation, as well as a green roof planted with sedum. Annalie Riches told design journalist Caroline Roux in a Guardian interview: “It’s supposed to protect the roof felt from sun damage, and in time it will form its own ecosystem. The first summer we were here [2002] it changed color, too, it was covered with so many ladybirds.”

whatcotts yard, in between homes, terrace homes, terraced houses, ullmayer sylvester architects, london homes, sustainable homes, sustainable design, annalie riches, barti garibaldo

High ceilings and expansive room left use of the interior spaces up to the imagination. Accordingly, each of the three homes was customized with different priorities in mind. Barti Garibaldo’s focus was on a large kitchen area to entertain, and a desire to have a studio leading out to the garden, while Silvia Ullmayer’s kitchen has an urban outlook. Annalie Riches opted to restrict her metropolitan view from the kitchen preferring to look at nature while cooking, and has even allowed for a double height space between the ground and first floor to hang her trapeze in her home.

Unlike many architects, UllmayerSylvester Architects have developed a design philosophy based on hands-on, direct experience in the pursuit of thoughtful and well-executed design. The Whatcotts Yard project serves as an appropriate example of these principles. As a self-built home, simple and functional design is at its core, but as these re-invented terrace houses prove, simple does not exclude the possibility of hosting quite a few eco-friendly attributes.

“It is a reminder of the value of direct architectural design – in contrast to the work of some architects who try too hard to be too clever with quotes, gambits and tricks.” (AJ First Building Award, Judges Summary)

+ Ullmayer Sylvester Architects

+ The Slow Home Movement

via Remodelista

3 Responses to “Whatcotts Yard ‘In-between’ terrace houses”

daiku Says:

September 19th, 2008 at 2:12 pm

very simple and veryvery beautiful

niels Says:

September 21st, 2008 at 2:52 pm

The first project I’ve seen where the tendency of inhabitants to hang curtains isn’t neglected ( modernism and rockstar architects) . It’s excepted as a part of living and it looks very beautiful. Basic form that leads to incredible space, impressive.

Slane Says:

March 25th, 2009 at 10:41 am

“located at such a close distance, would lead to an unacceptable loss of light and outlook to 72a Lynn mews”

“This separation distance of 8 metres (actually 6.5 metres) is considered unacceptable given the two storey nature of the proposal.The gardens of these properties, 104 and 106 palatine road, are small, measuring approximately 20 cubic metres (by omitting my dining room extension) The proposal would adversely affect light and outlook to the rear of these properties to an unacceptable degree, reducing the quality of life of these residents”.

The above applied to the failed application that was 7.1 metres, It is my view that it also applied to the approved development, as shaving a few inches off here and there, made no difference to the points laid out by the council (above) clearly now at a non complying 7.2 metres it has caused more detriment than the council originally claimed.

These comments were made by Femi Nwanzi (Hackney Planning) and the Secretary of state for the Enviroments office when they Failed this development.

After they were paid by the developers Riches and Garibaldo to look the other way, all details of the detriment it would cause to the surrounding houses was omitted and a second identical development was approved.

Antonia if you really are a designer you should not be promoting these crooks who deliberately destroyed the environment of so many of the existing houses by blotting out their view and invading their human rights to privacy. Promoting this project as good design is like saying nuclear bombs are great designs. If you are interested in seeing what the council and the SoSftE thought you can contact me on Steve@aclgroup.co.uk
Or you could do what the corrupted officers of Hackney and Riches and co have done and sweep it under the carpet.

regards

Steve

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.