<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Affordable and still Green: Sandbag Houses by MMA Architects</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:57:17 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: EnergyEvolutions</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-118869</link> <dc:creator>EnergyEvolutions</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:33:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/#comment-118869</guid> <description>Sand is actually a great insulator! Inside an earthdome building, which also uses sand, the temperatures stay moderate in the heat or cold, depending on the time of year.And you can make natural plasters to seal the dwelling... no chemicals or synthetic materials are needed. AT ALL.I can see more people adopting this design since people are use to square and rectangular houses.However, earthdomes are very strong, not to mention very cool in design in my opinion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sand is actually a great insulator! Inside an earthdome building, which also uses sand, the temperatures stay moderate in the heat or cold, depending on the time of year.</p><p>And you can make natural plasters to seal the dwelling&#8230; no chemicals or synthetic materials are needed. AT ALL.</p><p>I can see more people adopting this design since people are use to square and rectangular houses.</p><p>However, earthdomes are very strong, not to mention very cool in design in my opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vega</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-112048</link> <dc:creator>vega</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:55:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/#comment-112048</guid> <description>i need more info,</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need more info,</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lightbringer</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-109183</link> <dc:creator>Lightbringer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:08:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/#comment-109183</guid> <description>I only see one problem, sand transmits heat very well. These houses would need some good insulation which would make the walls even thicker. Other than that, nice houses. And who doesn&#039;t want a house made of the same things we use to stop floods and bullets.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only see one problem, sand transmits heat very well. These houses would need some good insulation which would make the walls even thicker. Other than that, nice houses. And who doesn&#8217;t want a house made of the same things we use to stop floods and bullets.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: janieliza</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-107600</link> <dc:creator>janieliza</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:49:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/#comment-107600</guid> <description>I can see the need to provide a wind and water barrier like dryvit to the construction.  I agree that you can&#039;t just use plywood and sand.  Weather conditions in desert areas would be the first to damage that kind of construction.  You simply MUST have a means to control the sand... and the air and water that will infiltrate the outer wall.  I suppose without that layer you could call this the ultimate of dirt to dirt housing... because that is what would happen.  Water vapor from inside and outside and wind infiltration would make short work of a sand only wall.I think too that it would help to include a sticky/tar layer to prevent nail/screw holes from puncturing all the bags with nothing to prevent the bags from leaking back into the interior when a nail or screw was removed.  There must be some product that would seal those bags with repeated punctures that will occur over the life of the building... or simply make a rule that all wall hangings have to be dropped from a trim board near the ceiling.  The exterior is much the same.  You need a system to seal the exterior wall that does not damage the bags or provides for resealing the bags automatically when a siding nail hits one.  Without protection from the wind which can easily rip things like vinyl off the building, your sand bags would begin to leak and would fill the remainder of the lower air space in the cavity rather than provide insulation and sound barriers to the outside at high as they were when originally put in place.  Perhaps that would best be accomplished by using a urea based expanding foam... but then you get formaldehyde.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the need to provide a wind and water barrier like dryvit to the construction.  I agree that you can&#8217;t just use plywood and sand.  Weather conditions in desert areas would be the first to damage that kind of construction.  You simply MUST have a means to control the sand&#8230; and the air and water that will infiltrate the outer wall.  I suppose without that layer you could call this the ultimate of dirt to dirt housing&#8230; because that is what would happen.  Water vapor from inside and outside and wind infiltration would make short work of a sand only wall.</p><p>I think too that it would help to include a sticky/tar layer to prevent nail/screw holes from puncturing all the bags with nothing to prevent the bags from leaking back into the interior when a nail or screw was removed.  There must be some product that would seal those bags with repeated punctures that will occur over the life of the building&#8230; or simply make a rule that all wall hangings have to be dropped from a trim board near the ceiling.  The exterior is much the same.  You need a system to seal the exterior wall that does not damage the bags or provides for resealing the bags automatically when a siding nail hits one.  Without protection from the wind which can easily rip things like vinyl off the building, your sand bags would begin to leak and would fill the remainder of the lower air space in the cavity rather than provide insulation and sound barriers to the outside at high as they were when originally put in place.  Perhaps that would best be accomplished by using a urea based expanding foam&#8230; but then you get formaldehyde.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cathy Clemens</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-107346</link> <dc:creator>Cathy Clemens</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:14:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/#comment-107346</guid> <description>Incredible! I don&#039;t see a downfall at all.
@Chrisp68- That would A. Require more plywood in the construction and B. not possible to build.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredible! I don&#8217;t see a downfall at all.<br
/> @Chrisp68- That would A. Require more plywood in the construction and B. not possible to build.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chrisp68</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-106653</link> <dc:creator>chrisp68</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:05:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/#comment-106653</guid> <description>interesting building method by why use bags?  just fill the walls with sand and use ply wood for the forms</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting building method by why use bags?  just fill the walls with sand and use ply wood for the forms</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chrisp68</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-106652</link> <dc:creator>chrisp68</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:04:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/#comment-106652</guid> <description>interesting way of building but why bags?  Use just use a closed wall to hold the sand.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting way of building but why bags?  Use just use a closed wall to hold the sand.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kategorisiz Bilgi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kum çuvalarından yapılmış ucuz ve güzel evler</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-106641</link> <dc:creator>Kategorisiz Bilgi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kum çuvalarından yapılmış ucuz ve güzel evler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:39:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/#comment-106641</guid> <description>[...] İngiltere’nin MMA Architects şirketi geçenlerde kum çuvalı ve keresteden ev yaparak bu yıl Curry Stone Vakfının tasarım ödülünü kazandı. Bu ödül sığınak, sağlık hizmetleri, barış, temiz su, hava veya gıda sunan kuruluş ve bireylere veriliyor.Kum çuvalarından yapılan evin maliyeti yaklaşık 6000 dolar ve düşük gelirli aileleri için çok uygun. Evlerin yapımında ayrıca evlerin gelecek sakinleri de katıldı.Diğer fotoğrafların linki. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] İngiltere’nin MMA Architects şirketi geçenlerde kum çuvalı ve keresteden ev yaparak bu yıl Curry Stone Vakfının tasarım ödülünü kazandı. Bu ödül sığınak, sağlık hizmetleri, barış, temiz su, hava veya gıda sunan kuruluş ve bireylere veriliyor.Kum çuvalarından yapılan evin maliyeti yaklaşık 6000 dolar ve düşük gelirli aileleri için çok uygun. Evlerin yapımında ayrıca evlerin gelecek sakinleri de katıldı.Diğer fotoğrafların linki. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: daveg</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/comment-page-1/#comment-106623</link> <dc:creator>daveg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:11:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/10/sandbag-house-mma-architects/#comment-106623</guid> <description>Great to see sandbag construction getting some press.  In a country like South Africa, with an abundance of sand, it makes good sense.  These guys have opted for the EcoBeam solution, where it is essentially a timber frame house with sandbags as the filler for the walls.Eternally Solar (http://www.eternallysolar.com) are punting a sandbag only construction method using an simple yet innovative adaptation of a standard polyprop bag.We&#039;ve almost completed a set of stables using this method and sand from our own property.
An as yet incomplete record of the construction can be found here, although the pictures on Flickr are up to date:
http://digitalpilgrim.typepad.com/stables/The problem is getting people who have been historically disenfranchised and now desperate for &quot;proper housing&quot; to see that this sort of construction is vastly superior in terms of quality of life, energy efficiency and sustainability than a shoddy brick and mortar home.  And it costs a lot less too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see sandbag construction getting some press.  In a country like South Africa, with an abundance of sand, it makes good sense.  These guys have opted for the EcoBeam solution, where it is essentially a timber frame house with sandbags as the filler for the walls.</p><p>Eternally Solar (<a
href="http://www.eternallysolar.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.eternallysolar.com</a>) are punting a sandbag only construction method using an simple yet innovative adaptation of a standard polyprop bag.</p><p>We&#8217;ve almost completed a set of stables using this method and sand from our own property.<br
/> An as yet incomplete record of the construction can be found here, although the pictures on Flickr are up to date:<br
/> <a
href="http://digitalpilgrim.typepad.com/stables/" rel="nofollow">http://digitalpilgrim.typepad.com/stables/</a></p><p>The problem is getting people who have been historically disenfranchised and now desperate for &#8220;proper housing&#8221; to see that this sort of construction is vastly superior in terms of quality of life, energy efficiency and sustainability than a shoddy brick and mortar home.  And it costs a lot less too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 24/37 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-24 12:17:25 -->