<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Protecting Storm Swept Coastlines With Oyster Shell Seawalls</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/11/19/protecting-eroded-coastlines-with-oyster-seawalls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/11/19/protecting-eroded-coastlines-with-oyster-seawalls/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:04:58 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Christian Biggins</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/11/19/protecting-eroded-coastlines-with-oyster-seawalls/comment-page-1/#comment-111816</link> <dc:creator>Christian Biggins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:51:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/11/19/protecting-eroded-coastlines-with-oyster-seawalls/#comment-111816</guid> <description>Thats such an awesome approach. It surprises me that something so simple hasnt been tried earlier.
Great post.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats such an awesome approach. It surprises me that something so simple hasnt been tried earlier.<br
/> Great post.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 24/29 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-25 13:36:55 -->