<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Workspace of the Future: Cambridge&#8217;s Creative Exchange</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/21/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/21/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:55:06 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: nofelix</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/21/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-115924</link> <dc:creator>nofelix</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:31:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/21/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/#comment-115924</guid> <description>angie717 -Because 90 degree angles are efficient? It&#039;s easy to fit furniture in right angled corners, Cladding materials and flooring systems are made rectilinear, as are many other things.If you could save a lot of energy/material by using different shapes I&#039;m sure they would have done it. If they were using different materials (like earth filled tires) that don&#039;t work better with 90 degree angles then fine, criticize away. But it&#039;s not a bad thing to use cubes just because they&#039;re simple.Then again, if you made something that looks more than superficially like this in your first semester then maybe you&#039;re a genius and know more than I.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>angie717 -</p><p>Because 90 degree angles are efficient? It&#8217;s easy to fit furniture in right angled corners, Cladding materials and flooring systems are made rectilinear, as are many other things.</p><p>If you could save a lot of energy/material by using different shapes I&#8217;m sure they would have done it. If they were using different materials (like earth filled tires) that don&#8217;t work better with 90 degree angles then fine, criticize away. But it&#8217;s not a bad thing to use cubes just because they&#8217;re simple.</p><p>Then again, if you made something that looks more than superficially like this in your first semester then maybe you&#8217;re a genius and know more than I.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: angie717</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/21/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-115755</link> <dc:creator>angie717</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:19:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/21/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/#comment-115755</guid> <description>I get that this building is &quot;green&quot; and uses solar energy, and I think that&#039;s great.  We should use more of this technology in our buildings.  However, why do architects and designers that build &quot;green&quot; and modern buildings seem to be obsessed with 90 degree angles and cubes?  This somewhat resembles my final project from my first semester of architecture...which isn&#039;t a compliment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get that this building is &#8220;green&#8221; and uses solar energy, and I think that&#8217;s great.  We should use more of this technology in our buildings.  However, why do architects and designers that build &#8220;green&#8221; and modern buildings seem to be obsessed with 90 degree angles and cubes?  This somewhat resembles my final project from my first semester of architecture&#8230;which isn&#8217;t a compliment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chrisp68</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/21/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/comment-page-1/#comment-115689</link> <dc:creator>chrisp68</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:06:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/01/21/cambridge-creative-exchange-by-5th-studio/#comment-115689</guid> <description>Please tell me this is not the future.  This is so far from eco friendly, if not just a monstrosity to look at!  Looks like a beach house on stilts gone bad.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell me this is not the future.  This is so far from eco friendly, if not just a monstrosity to look at!  Looks like a beach house on stilts gone bad.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 22/31 queries in 0.010 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-26 00:02:18 -->