<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Monitoring Water Pollution With Robotic Fish</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/03/26/monitoring-water-pollution-with-robotic-fish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/03/26/monitoring-water-pollution-with-robotic-fish/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:29:23 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: k8007</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/03/26/monitoring-water-pollution-with-robotic-fish/comment-page-1/#comment-122957</link> <dc:creator>k8007</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:26:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=22092#comment-122957</guid> <description>I know that this is a very important topic, but $28,000???? for each fish?!? and are they going to put them in every river too? theyre not even solving the problem theyre just telling us how bad it is in certain points. We already know its bad! Could this money not be better spent stopping the cause of the problem in the first place? Like better filtration of waste into the river, or creating technology which not only monitors the CO2 and O2 levels but regulates it also to stop tropification (which causes the delicate river ecosystem of the river to die).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that this is a very important topic, but $28,000???? for each fish?!? and are they going to put them in every river too? theyre not even solving the problem theyre just telling us how bad it is in certain points. We already know its bad! Could this money not be better spent stopping the cause of the problem in the first place? Like better filtration of waste into the river, or creating technology which not only monitors the CO2 and O2 levels but regulates it also to stop tropification (which causes the delicate river ecosystem of the river to die).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 24/29 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-27 23:48:26 -->