<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: PG&amp;E Announces Solar Power From Space By 2016</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/20/solar-power-from-space-by-2016/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/20/solar-power-from-space-by-2016/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:29:23 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jaen</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/20/solar-power-from-space-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-134415</link> <dc:creator>Jaen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:20:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=24604#comment-134415</guid> <description>Given the size of the human population, the energy demands of our increasingly various and complex technologies, the great disparities in access to  same and economies of scale, some large projects will be necessary to meet demand. Although, in some industries, food production/distribution for instance, economies of scale have been exceeded and decentralization and lower tech applications are very likely to prove more efficient in meeting our needs, the sophistication and expense of the materials and technology of energy production and high demand, simply will not be met economically in small scale applications.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the size of the human population, the energy demands of our increasingly various and complex technologies, the great disparities in access to  same and economies of scale, some large projects will be necessary to meet demand. Although, in some industries, food production/distribution for instance, economies of scale have been exceeded and decentralization and lower tech applications are very likely to prove more efficient in meeting our needs, the sophistication and expense of the materials and technology of energy production and high demand, simply will not be met economically in small scale applications.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alexjameslowe</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/20/solar-power-from-space-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-130822</link> <dc:creator>alexjameslowe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:06:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=24604#comment-130822</guid> <description>echarles-I don&#039;t think this is a quick fix- it will take a couple of decades before a large space-based solar generators can be deployed on a large scale.&quot;This is what a cell phone uses- now lets see here… didn’t they discover that too much cellphone use is bad for you????&quot;No, they didn&#039;t discover that. The studies on that topic are dubious and equivocal at best.&quot;Is this going to cause a bigger hole in the atmosphere?&quot;Ozone depletion is caused by a chemical reaction between oxygen and chlorofluorocarbon pollution. The radiation from space-based solar collectors wouldn&#039;t react with the air hardly at all. People have been using radio emitters and microwave emitters since WWII and even before- it is one of the most robust and well-documented technologies that exist. If they did alter the chemical make-up of air, we would have seen it by now.That said, it *would* indeed be dangerous to live in a large column of microwave radiation from space. Precisely because of that, engineers are looking into radio and laser transmission. The latter could be very precisely directed, although lasers tend to be less efficient in the atmosphere.It&#039;s true that the long-term effects would need careful study. But we already know what the long-term effects of our current trajectory are if we do nothing- total disaster.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>echarles-</p><p> I don&#8217;t think this is a quick fix- it will take a couple of decades before a large space-based solar generators can be deployed on a large scale.</p><p>&#8220;This is what a cell phone uses- now lets see here… didn’t they discover that too much cellphone use is bad for you????&#8221;</p><p>No, they didn&#8217;t discover that. The studies on that topic are dubious and equivocal at best.</p><p>&#8220;Is this going to cause a bigger hole in the atmosphere?&#8221;</p><p>Ozone depletion is caused by a chemical reaction between oxygen and chlorofluorocarbon pollution. The radiation from space-based solar collectors wouldn&#8217;t react with the air hardly at all. People have been using radio emitters and microwave emitters since WWII and even before- it is one of the most robust and well-documented technologies that exist. If they did alter the chemical make-up of air, we would have seen it by now.</p><p>That said, it *would* indeed be dangerous to live in a large column of microwave radiation from space. Precisely because of that, engineers are looking into radio and laser transmission. The latter could be very precisely directed, although lasers tend to be less efficient in the atmosphere.</p><p>It&#8217;s true that the long-term effects would need careful study. But we already know what the long-term effects of our current trajectory are if we do nothing- total disaster.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ELBOW FINGER</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/20/solar-power-from-space-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-130755</link> <dc:creator>ELBOW FINGER</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:42:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=24604#comment-130755</guid> <description>This coming from the company that gave all of those people cancer from polluted ground water.  And yes I just watched erin brocovitch.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This coming from the company that gave all of those people cancer from polluted ground water.  And yes I just watched erin brocovitch.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gong Jian</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/20/solar-power-from-space-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-130264</link> <dc:creator>Gong Jian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:00:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=24604#comment-130264</guid> <description>I&#039;m a reporter for China Energy News.I want to hear you.
Best,
Gong Jian from Beijing</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a reporter for China Energy News.I want to hear you.<br
/> Best,<br
/> Gong Jian from Beijing</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: echarles</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/20/solar-power-from-space-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-129789</link> <dc:creator>echarles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:36:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=24604#comment-129789</guid> <description>BAD BAD BAD
Is this going to cause a bigger hole in the atmosphere?  Plus I though we already had a death-ray.  What if a bit of space dust bumps it and children in south america get fried.Wow the world is bad- rich people need to stop rushing into ideas that are just quick fixes.  We need some real innovation without scary consequences.
Dear alexlowe:  I think you are missing the fact that it says they are beaming MICROWAVES.  This is what a cell phone uses- now lets see here... didn\&#039;t they discover that too much cellphone use is bad for you????  Doesn\&#039;t your microwave come with warnings about standing away from it while it is running???  Also lets take a look at the fundamentals:  this is a big project and we have no idea what it could do in the long run. Example Hoover dam- yeah it makes a lot of power, yeah it gave people jobs and money, but big problem- it changed to face of the earth and the heat produced from the turbines is ruining the ecosystem in the river downstream.  YUCKY- no I don\&#039;t agree with this at all.  We need to start small on the consumer product end first.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BAD BAD BAD<br
/> Is this going to cause a bigger hole in the atmosphere?  Plus I though we already had a death-ray.  What if a bit of space dust bumps it and children in south america get fried.</p><p>Wow the world is bad- rich people need to stop rushing into ideas that are just quick fixes.  We need some real innovation without scary consequences.</p><p>Dear alexlowe:  I think you are missing the fact that it says they are beaming MICROWAVES.  This is what a cell phone uses- now lets see here&#8230; didn\&#8217;t they discover that too much cellphone use is bad for you????  Doesn\&#8217;t your microwave come with warnings about standing away from it while it is running???  Also lets take a look at the fundamentals:  this is a big project and we have no idea what it could do in the long run. Example Hoover dam- yeah it makes a lot of power, yeah it gave people jobs and money, but big problem- it changed to face of the earth and the heat produced from the turbines is ruining the ecosystem in the river downstream.  YUCKY- no I don\&#8217;t agree with this at all.  We need to start small on the consumer product end first.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alexlowe</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/20/solar-power-from-space-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-129559</link> <dc:creator>alexlowe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:51:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=24604#comment-129559</guid> <description>This is a brilliant idea that will absolutely be the key to ending the fossil fuel age.As for the concerns that we are \\\&#039;blasting\\\&#039; the earth with more radiation- please read basic physics. The orbiting solar collectors are not creating any additional energy to transmit through the atmosphere. They are merely converting a tiny fraction of the sun\\\&#039;s rays directed at Earth into a more usable form.The critical point is that the radiation is already directed at Earth, so it will hit the atmosphere *regardless of whether the solar collectors are there or not*In fact, the energy in the form beamed down by the solar collectors does not react with CO2 molecules in the same way visible light does- i.e. they will generally not contribute to the greenhouse effect at all. And once you factor in the amount of pollution this will displace, it is clearly a brilliant idea.I\\\&#039;m not a fan of BigCorp either, but it seems like they\\\&#039;ve hit this on the head.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a brilliant idea that will absolutely be the key to ending the fossil fuel age.</p><p>As for the concerns that we are \\\&#8217;blasting\\\&#8217; the earth with more radiation- please read basic physics. The orbiting solar collectors are not creating any additional energy to transmit through the atmosphere. They are merely converting a tiny fraction of the sun\\\&#8217;s rays directed at Earth into a more usable form.</p><p>The critical point is that the radiation is already directed at Earth, so it will hit the atmosphere *regardless of whether the solar collectors are there or not*</p><p>In fact, the energy in the form beamed down by the solar collectors does not react with CO2 molecules in the same way visible light does- i.e. they will generally not contribute to the greenhouse effect at all. And once you factor in the amount of pollution this will displace, it is clearly a brilliant idea.</p><p>I\\\&#8217;m not a fan of BigCorp either, but it seems like they\\\&#8217;ve hit this on the head.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: aarioli</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/20/solar-power-from-space-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-129332</link> <dc:creator>aarioli</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:32:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=24604#comment-129332</guid> <description>This is big, centralized and dangerous.  A BigCorp initiative.  We need small, decentralized power supply, not trillion dollar targets.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is big, centralized and dangerous.  A BigCorp initiative.  We need small, decentralized power supply, not trillion dollar targets.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: treythefarmer</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/20/solar-power-from-space-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-128885</link> <dc:creator>treythefarmer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:04:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=24604#comment-128885</guid> <description>Solaren is a little bit ridiculous.  Check out this wired.com story: http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/04/weathermod.html
I feel like blasting the earth with radiation is probably a recipe for disaster, but maybe im old fashioned.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solaren is a little bit ridiculous.  Check out this wired.com story: <a
href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/04/weathermod.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/04/weathermod.html</a><br
/> I feel like blasting the earth with radiation is probably a recipe for disaster, but maybe im old fashioned.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pogi</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/20/solar-power-from-space-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-128832</link> <dc:creator>pogi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:10:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=24604#comment-128832</guid> <description>C&#039;mon, do we want to pump more energy to our overheating planet??</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, do we want to pump more energy to our overheating planet??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 24/37 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-27 23:25:17 -->