<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Energy 101: Where Does Our Power Come From?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/23/energy-101-where-does-our-power-come-from/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/23/energy-101-where-does-our-power-come-from/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:48:56 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: cb736</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/23/energy-101-where-does-our-power-come-from/comment-page-1/#comment-160505</link> <dc:creator>cb736</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:59:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=25518#comment-160505</guid> <description>Actually there is nothing different about using 100% renewable energy from the way we use the grid today, other than the fact that we have to use transmission lines and storage while with non-renewable energy they are not required to the same degree. What is needed is not a smart grid, but a smart consumer - and smart producers. There are already devices that sense load changes, due to the frequency change in the grid, and can shut down until the frequency recovers. The only difference between using non-renewable and renewable energy is that we need more storage, and more transmission, so that we can store energy for when we need it, and move it, through transmission lines, to where it can be used. We already use both, we just need to build more for when we switch over to 100% renewable. A smart grid is not needed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually there is nothing different about using 100% renewable energy from the way we use the grid today, other than the fact that we have to use transmission lines and storage while with non-renewable energy they are not required to the same degree. What is needed is not a smart grid, but a smart consumer &#8211; and smart producers. There are already devices that sense load changes, due to the frequency change in the grid, and can shut down until the frequency recovers. The only difference between using non-renewable and renewable energy is that we need more storage, and more transmission, so that we can store energy for when we need it, and move it, through transmission lines, to where it can be used. We already use both, we just need to build more for when we switch over to 100% renewable. A smart grid is not needed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cb736</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/23/energy-101-where-does-our-power-come-from/comment-page-1/#comment-160504</link> <dc:creator>cb736</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:58:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=25518#comment-160504</guid> <description>Actually there is nothing different about using 100% renewable energy from the way we use the grid today, other than the fact that we have to use transmission lines and storage while with none renewable energy they are not required to the same degree. What is needed is not a smart grid, but a smart consumer - and smart producers. There are already devices that sense load changes, due to the frequency change in the grid, and can shut down until the frequency recovers. The only difference between using non-renewable and renewable energy is that we need more storage, and more transmission, so that we can store energy for when we need it, and move it, through transmission lines, to where it can be used. We already use both, we just need to build more for when we switch over to 100% renewable. A smart grid is not needed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually there is nothing different about using 100% renewable energy from the way we use the grid today, other than the fact that we have to use transmission lines and storage while with none renewable energy they are not required to the same degree. What is needed is not a smart grid, but a smart consumer &#8211; and smart producers. There are already devices that sense load changes, due to the frequency change in the grid, and can shut down until the frequency recovers. The only difference between using non-renewable and renewable energy is that we need more storage, and more transmission, so that we can store energy for when we need it, and move it, through transmission lines, to where it can be used. We already use both, we just need to build more for when we switch over to 100% renewable. A smart grid is not needed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alexjameslowe</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/23/energy-101-where-does-our-power-come-from/comment-page-1/#comment-133247</link> <dc:creator>alexjameslowe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:08:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=25518#comment-133247</guid> <description>I hope they can build the smart-grid system in short order. That seems like it&#039;s one of a small group of technical hurdles that have to be overcome in order to have a true renewable energy economy. The others being cheap, efficient solar panels, and solid-state hydrogen storage. If we can get those ducks are in a row, we might be alright.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they can build the smart-grid system in short order. That seems like it&#8217;s one of a small group of technical hurdles that have to be overcome in order to have a true renewable energy economy. The others being cheap, efficient solar panels, and solid-state hydrogen storage. If we can get those ducks are in a row, we might be alright.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jeanX</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/04/23/energy-101-where-does-our-power-come-from/comment-page-1/#comment-133224</link> <dc:creator>jeanX</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:08:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=25518#comment-133224</guid> <description>I read it can only be used on edges of tectonic plates, a very narrow range.
Geothermal power often requires drilling to great depths.
Whereas geothermal hvac can be used just about anywhere.
Only thing is, it&#039;s very expensive.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read it can only be used on edges of tectonic plates, a very narrow range.<br
/> Geothermal power often requires drilling to great depths.<br
/> Whereas geothermal hvac can be used just about anywhere.<br
/> Only thing is, it&#8217;s very expensive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 22/32 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-26 07:15:38 -->