Comments on: Philadelphia Rolls Out Solar-Powered Trash Compactors

By: trippycheez@yahoo.com

trippycheez@yahoo.com — Sun, 31 May 2009 20:10:12 +0000

As a Philadelphian, I’m pleased to see an alternative to the current system (trash cans constantly overflowing with litter) that includes recycling! It’s only a matter of time, though, before the solar panels get covered up with graffiti and stickers…meaning this potentially will cost more when you factor in the maintainence.

FYI, both Drexel University and the University of Pennsylvania are located in Philly.

By: sixpackistan

sixpackistan — Fri, 29 May 2009 19:43:07 +0000

All in all, if the city were interested in keeping costs low it would investigate trimming down it’s huge fleet of cars which employees use for personal use, turning off the lights in municipal buildings and schools when employees are gone, switching out all incandescent bulbs in city owned properties and in traffic and street lights, retrofitting municipal buildings with timed thermostats and moving court and administration offices out of city hall which is an environmental nightmare in its own right. This kind of eco-babble-green-energy-bullshit is just a distraction from solving real energy problems with real simple and cheap solutions that don’t require the taxpayers to shell out millions of dollars. Just because the city says it will save 12 million over 10 years doesn’t mean it will save a dime at all. The only thing we know for certain is that they have wasted time and energy solving a problem that wasn’t demanding a solution because some sales guy with a fancy trashcan got under the skin of the right group of politicians.

By: hankchapot

hankchapot — Fri, 29 May 2009 19:32:32 +0000

I am a gardener at University of California, bur we also empty trash cans and the lifting is injuring the workers, shoulders, back injuries, etc. Now, increase the weight by 8X and you’ll need another method than one person lifting.

By: bnlaneville

bnlaneville — Fri, 29 May 2009 18:56:11 +0000

These have also been in select locations around Chattanooga for some time. I think the savings estimate is a very liberal. I also believe that savings is before the cost of the cans are calculated. Also the cheapest “Big Belly” that I could locate was $1,400+ (not the ones pictured.) Though the system that they have pictured is about $5800, though they may have got them for the manufacturer at a lower cost. If the system they are using is the aluminum recycling bin that obviously would generate some revenue along with advertisements on the side panels (along with generating more waste.)

Cost of Double Units: $1,218,000 @ MSRP (210 UNITS)
Cost of Single Units: $1,340,090 @ MSRP (290 UNITS)
COST OF AD PANELS: $52,500 @ MSRP (500 SETS)
Total: $2,610,590

By: westhomas

westhomas — Fri, 29 May 2009 14:25:46 +0000

I’ve been wondering about these things.. been seeing them a couple of weeks now.

Awesome implementation, and the reduction of labor involved is probably a bigger savings than it may seem at first.

By: koloraro

koloraro — Fri, 29 May 2009 13:22:14 +0000

And.. how much costs every \”big-belly\” ?

By: v8media

v8media — Thu, 28 May 2009 21:44:37 +0000

I think labor costs, fuel costs, and dump costs over the whole of a city could easily make up a million dollars.

Just a note that these have been in Seattle for a while now. Not sure when they showed up though.

Ian

By: CHMMX

CHMMX — Thu, 28 May 2009 21:31:18 +0000

Abilene, Texas (a city near where I live) installed a few downtown a couple of months ago, I’m gonna go down there one of these days just to see them.

By: iclimb4me

iclimb4me — Thu, 28 May 2009 20:48:56 +0000

I’d like to find out how it’s going to save the city over a million dollars every year. I understand that the labor to pick up the garbage comes with a price, but for curious purposes, were might these other savings come from???