<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What do YOU think about our new site layout?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/06/18/what-do-you-think-about-our-new-site-layout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/06/18/what-do-you-think-about-our-new-site-layout/</link> <description>Future-forward design for the world you inhabit</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:34:26 -0500</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: akay</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/06/18/what-do-you-think-about-our-new-site-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-156077</link> <dc:creator>akay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:54:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=35013#comment-156077</guid> <description>It&#039;s nice that the site loads faster, however, I browse design blogs by image, not by headline. If an image draws me in, I follow up with the story, and not the other way around.Based on the larger images in the most recent stories, it seems this design may have been rethought. If that&#039;s not the case, squinting at the teensy story images is both frustrating and painful when there are many other fish in the sea of design blogs available for browsing. When I first came across the tiny images here, I nearly closed the window out of sheer irritation before I even came upon this survey.I&#039;d suggest attaching two site CSS styles, and allowing users to select which style they&#039;d like to see, either image-dominant or text-dominant.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice that the site loads faster, however, I browse design blogs by image, not by headline. If an image draws me in, I follow up with the story, and not the other way around.</p><p>Based on the larger images in the most recent stories, it seems this design may have been rethought. If that&#8217;s not the case, squinting at the teensy story images is both frustrating and painful when there are many other fish in the sea of design blogs available for browsing. When I first came across the tiny images here, I nearly closed the window out of sheer irritation before I even came upon this survey.</p><p>I&#8217;d suggest attaching two site CSS styles, and allowing users to select which style they&#8217;d like to see, either image-dominant or text-dominant.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: undeadbydawn</title><link>http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/06/18/what-do-you-think-about-our-new-site-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-150915</link> <dc:creator>undeadbydawn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:17:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhabitat.com/?p=35013#comment-150915</guid> <description>Why is it blue? Keep the green and you win. The blue theme looks like an Argos catalogue.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it blue? Keep the green and you win. The blue theme looks like an Argos catalogue.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 24/30 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached

Served from: 72.52.195.188 @ 2009-11-23 04:48:37 -->